The language represented by inscriptions from the territory of the Venetiâbetween the Po River, the Carnic Alps, and Istriaâis called Venetic. The majority of discoveries come from sanctuaries at Este and LĂ gole di Calalzo. The Venetic inscriptions (of which there are about 300, ranging from the 5th to the 1st century bce) consist almost entirely of brief epitaphs and dedications.
Unclassified
Several very early texts cannot be ascribed with certainty to any of the individual languages listed above but show linguistic features of a broadly Osco-Umbrian/South Picene type. The most important of these is found on an inscribed flask from Poggio Sommavilla (in Sabine territory), dating from the end of the 7th century bce.
Writing systems
The scripts used for writing these languages include the Greek alphabet in Bruttium and Lucania and the Latin alphabet and various derivations of the Etruscan alphabet in the other regions. Five ânationalâ or ânativeâ alphabets are distinguished: , , , , and .
Origins of the Italic languages
The Italic languages must have been brought from the original area of the Indo-European languages, perhaps in eastern parts of central Europe, when their speakers crossed the Alps. This is attested to by a stratum of very old place-names of non-Indo-European originâe.g., Tarracina (modern Terracina), Capuaâthat covers not only the Apennine Peninsula but also Greece and Anatolia. This stratum is ascribed to a âMediterraneanâ language believed to have dominated large parts of the ancient world before the arrival of the Indo-European peoples. Nothing is known about the date, the path, and the circumstances of the above-mentioned immigration, and none of the many attempts to combine archaeological evidence with linguistic prehistory has led to convincing results. Thus, the only resources available for studying the Italic languages are exclusively linguistic methods of comparative philology.
Linguistic characteristics
Phonology
Many of the phonetic processes that make the attested Italic languages differ from the reconstructed Indo-European language seem to have occurred relatively late in time. The only one that can confidently be placed outside of Italyâthat is, before the immigration over the Alpsâis the change to ss in combinations of d (dental occlusive, or dental stop) + t. This is a feature common to Celtic, Germanic, and the Italic languages. For example, Latin visus comes from the older, reconstructed form *wissos âseenâ; this is cognate with High German gi-wiss âsurely knownâ and Old Irish ro-fess âis known,â all of these forms deriving from an Indo-European term *wid-to-s, with d + t. (An asterisk [*] before a word means that it is not attested but reconstructed.)
The development of the Indo-European labiovelar stop kw is more complex. (A labiovelar stop is a sound pronounced with simultaneous articulationâmovementâof the lips and the velum, the soft palate.) From this sound there has resulted a qu in Latin, p in Osco-Umbrian and South Picene, c in Irish, and p in Brythonic Celtic; e.g., Latin quis âwho(ever)â is cognate with Oscan pis and Umbrian pis (similarly South Picene pim âwhom[ever]â or âwhich[ever]â), these forms deriving from Indo-European *kwis; and Irish cia is related to Welsh pwy, âwho,â derived from Indo-European *kwei. Some scholars have tried to trace this development back to an Italo-Celtic unity, but the change of Brythonic kw to p is surely later than the dropping of the p in Common Celtic. It is sounder, therefore, to assume independent processes in the different languages.
Other features developed in Italy itselfâe.g., the use of the voiceless dental spirant (fricative) f that is shared with Etruscan and is lacking in marginal districts of Venetic. In all Italic languages this f sound replaced the Indo-European voiced aspirated sounds (represented as bh, dh, gwh) in initial position. Examples of the use of f in Italic are as follows: Latin frater âbrotherâ = Umbrian frater, from Indo-European *bhrÄtÄr; Latin facio âI do, makeâ is related to Oscan fakiiad âhe should doâ and Venetic fagsto âhe made,â based on an Indo-European stem *dhÉ-k-. A more recent common process in Latin and Osco-Umbrian is the use of the full system of five short vowels in initial syllables only; short vowels of noninitial syllables in Latin became less openâe.g., facio âI do, make,â but in-ficio, the compound of in + facio. In Osco-Umbrian these vowels tend to be lost completelyâe.g., Umbrian benust âhe will have come,â but Oscan cebnust âhe will have come near.â Some differences between Latin and Osco-Umbrian/South Picene probably arose during the last centuries bceâe.g., Osco-Umbrian/South Picene Ć changed to u (Oscan dĂșnĂșm, South Picene dĂșnoĂ, Latin dĆnum âgiftâ), Ä became i (Oscan ligud, Latin lÄge âlawâ in the ablative singular; South Picene spolĂtiĂș, Latin SpolÄtium [name of a town in Umbria, modern Spoleto]), and final Ä developed into o (viĂș [Ăș in the Oscan national alphabet = o], Latin via âwayâ). Indo-European voiced aspirated sounds (bh, dh, gwh) in internal position probably first became voiced spirants (e.g., sounds such as v) in all Italic languages and, later, voiced stops in Latin and Venetic and the voiceless spirant f in Osco-Umbrian, South Picene, and Faliscan. Examples of these changes (for Indo-European dh) are the voiced stop b in Latin liberi â(free) childrenâ and Venetic louderobos âchildrenâ (in the dative plural) versus the voiceless spirant f in Oscan loufro- âfreeâ and Faliscan loferta âfreed woman.â Examples for Indo-European bh are Oscan tfei, Umbrian tefe, South Picene tefeĂ versus Latin tibi âto/for you.â
Morphology
In contrast to the phonology, which shows so many correlations among the Italic languages, there are few definite connections between these tongues in their grammars. A characteristic innovation is the extension of the ablative singular case from o-stems and pronouns, where it occurred originally, to other declension classes: Latin praidad âwith the plunder,â later praeda, meretod âby merit,â Oscan toutad âby the people,â slaagid âof the border,â South Picene arĂtih (-h represents earlier -d) âwith skill.â Many of the morphological features common to Osco-Umbrian, South Picene, and Latin are shared by other Indo-European languages; that is, they are not Italic in a specific sense. For example, the a-subjunctiveâe.g., Latin faciat âmay he doâ and Oscan fakiiadâis also Celtic; passive endings in -râe.g., Oscan vincter and Latin vincitur âhe is conquered,â South Picene qolofĂtĂșr âhe honours/supportsâ or âhonour/support is shown toââare found in Celtic, Hittite, and Tocharian as well. More important are the discrepancies. For example, the genitive singular of o-stems shows -Ä« in Latin, Faliscan, and Venetic and in the Celtic languages, but -eis in Osco-Umbrian and South Picene; the nominative plural of the same class is marked by -oi in early Latin, Celtic, and Greek but by -Ćs in Osco-Umbrian, South Picene, Germanic, Sanskrit, and other languages. In addition, the perfect stems of secondary verbs (verbs derived from nouns or from other verbs) are formed by -u- or -v- in Latin, by -t(t)- in Oscan, by -s- in Venetic, and by a variety of formants in Umbrianâe.g., Latin donavit âhe has givenâ = Oscan duunated = Venetic donasto, Umbrian combifiansiust âhe will have announcedâ (with formant -nky-).