How did Plato distinguish between affirmation and negation?
In his dialogue the Sophist, Plato distinguished between affirmation and negation by moving away from the idea that negation implies absolute "not-being," which had previously created logical antinomies.12
Instead, Plato argued that a negative assertion of the form "A is not B" should be understood as having the force that A is "other" than B. By interpreting negation as a statement of difference (heteron) rather than a claim of non-existence, he resolved the conflict between Being and Not-Being.21
This analysis was supported by his structural breakdown of language, where he distinguished between names (nouns and adjectives) and verbs. He posited that a complete statement (logos) requires at least one of each, as a sequence of only names or only verbs cannot form a proposition capable of being true or false. This distinction allowed for a more sophisticated understanding of predication, providing a foundation for the logical analysis of statements that would be further developed by his pupil, Aristotle.34