- sources - Digitalization and Journalistic Sources
- media convergence - Technological convergence
- media convergence
- Misinformation and disinformation - Why people spread mis- and disinformation and why people fall for it
- Misinformation and disinformation - Mis- and disinformation in the 21st centuryâs increasingly complex information landscape
- Misinformation and disinformation - The emerging role of AI and what we can do in response
- corrections policies - Challenges and Recommendations
How can disinformation campaigns affect journalists who monitor social media?
In the context of media convergence, where digital tools and social media have become integral to the newsgathering process, disinformation campaigns pose significant risks to journalists who monitor these platforms.
When journalists use social media for story detectionâa practice sometimes referred to as ambient journalismâlarge-scale disinformation campaigns can bias their perception of public opinion. Because these campaigns are designed to reach wide audiences and often exploit emotional triggers, they can create a distorted information environment that makes it difficult for reporters to determine the trustworthiness of sources or the credibility of online material.12
Furthermore, journalists face a difficult ethical dilemma: efforts to debunk or expose false narratives can inadvertently amplify their reach, providing legitimacy to the disinformation and fueling the very fire they intend to extinguish. This creates a feedback loop where journalists may struggle to maintain the conventional values of accuracy and verification amidst the speed and volume of digital content. Consequently, newsrooms must increasingly rely on specialized techniques, such as forensic identification of fake media and geo-location, to navigate an ecosystem where objective facts are often overshadowed by emotional appeals.23415