Hitler Diaries
-
What were the Hitler Diaries?
The Hitler Diaries were a collection of 60 volumes of diaries attributed to Adolf Hitler that turned out to be one of the greatest hoaxes of modern times.
The diaries were forged between 1981 and 1983 by Konrad Kujau, who posed as an antiques dealer. The West German magazine Stern purchased the diaries for \$3.7 million in 1983, believing they were authentic, and then sold serial rights to other news outlets.
Doubts about the diaries' authenticity arose even as they were being published. Experts determined that Hitler's signature was inaccurate, the paper and ink were postwar productions, and the entries were filled with factual errors.
The scandal severely damaged Stern's credibility, led to resignations, and tainted the reputation of historian Hugh Trevor-Roper. Kujau and the Stern reporter involved were arrested, convicted of theft and fraud, and sentenced to prison.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who claimed to have discovered the Hitler Diaries?
The magazine Stern, a West German publication, claimed to have discovered the Hitler Diaries. In 1983, Stern bought the 60-volume set of diaries for approximately $3.7 million, believing them to be authentic. The diaries were purported to have been rescued from a plane that crashed in East Germany at the end of the war and hidden in a hayloft. Stern then sold serial rights to various news outlets. However, the diaries were later found to be forgeries created by Konrad Kujau.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why did people believe the Hitler Diaries were real at first?
Initially, people believed the Hitler Diaries were real because Stern, a West German magazine, claimed they were authentic after rescuing them from a plane crash in East Germany. The magazine spent \$3.7 million on the volumes and sold serial rights to news outlets.
Historian Hugh Trevor-Roper, initially skeptical, declared the diaries' authenticity after seeing the volume of material and accepting Stern's claim that the paper had been chemically tested.
However, suspicion arose when Stern couldn't identify the East German source. Experts later proved the diaries were fake because Hitler's signature was inaccurate, the paper and ink were postwar productions, and the entries were filled with factual errors.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How was it eventually proven that the Hitler Diaries were fake?
Doubts about the Hitler Diaries arose even as they were being published. To dispel rising suspicions, Stern magazine submitted volumes for examination to West German agencies, who then declared the diaries were fake.
Investigators found several inconsistencies, including inaccurate signatures, postwar paper and ink, artificially aged bindings, stylistic clichés, factual errors, and an incorrect initial.
Additionally, former German officers who had served as aides to Hitler attested that Hitler did not keep a diary and, especially at the end of the war, would not have had time to do so. The forger, Konrad Kujau, and the Stern reporter, Gerd Heidemann, were arrested and sentenced to prison for theft and fraud.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What impact did the Hitler Diaries hoax have on historians and the media?
The Hitler Diaries hoax significantly damaged the credibility of Stern magazine, leading to the resignation of two top editors. Rupert Murdoch's Times also faced an editorial shakeup, with the editor being forced to resign. Historian Hugh Trevor-Roper's reputation was permanently tainted after initially authenticating the diaries. The scandal prompted skepticism among reporters and led to the diaries being exposed as fakes by West German agencies. The forger, Konrad Kujau, and the Stern reporter, Gerd Heidemann, were arrested and sentenced to prison for theft and fraud.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What can we learn about the importance of verifying historical documents from the Hitler Diaries case?
The Hitler Diaries hoax underscores the critical importance of verifying historical documents. Despite initial authentication by historians, the diaries, purportedly written by Adolf Hitler, were exposed as forgeries. The scandal revealed failures in source verification, as Stern magazine rushed to publish without confirming the identity of its source and without conducting proper paper analysis. The diaries contained factual errors, stylistic inconsistencies, and an inaccurate signature. The incident damaged the reputations of those involved, including Stern and the London Sunday Times, and highlights the necessity of rigorous scrutiny.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Hitler Diaries, a 60-volume set of diaries, attributed to Adolf Hitler, at the center of one of the greatest hoaxes of modern times. The diaries had actually been produced between 1981–83 by forger Konrad Kujau, who posed as a Stuttgart antiques dealer named Konrad Fischer, and who had previously forged and sold paintings also purportedly by Hitler. Believing the diaries were authentic—rescued from a plane that had crashed in East Germany at the end of the war and subsequently hidden away in a hayloft—the West German magazine Stern had bought the volumes for some $3.7 million in 1983 and then sold serial rights to various news outlets, including to Rupert Murdoch’s London Sunday Times for more than one million dollars. Embarrassingly, the Sunday Times had also, in 1968, spent a quarter million dollars trying to buy the “Mussolini Diaries,” which also proved to be forgeries.
On April 25, 1983, with its cover announcing “Hitler’s Diaries Discovered,” Stern anticipated demand with an extra two million copies. Simultaneously in London, the Sunday Times rushed into print at the order of Murdoch, despite the misgivings of the paper’s editor, Frank Giles. As well, even as the diaries were being published, however, their veracity was being questioned by the very historians who had authenticated them. None of the experts suffered more than Hugh Trevor-Roper, whose authorship of The Last Days of Hitler (1947) had brought him fame, fortune, and immense academic prestige. Although initially skeptical upon hearing of the diaries, his skepticism had melted upon seeing the sheer volume of discovered material and accepting Stern’s proclamation that the diaries’ paper had been chemically tested (which had not occurred), and so he declared his belief in the volumes’ authenticity. But by April 25, Trevor-Roper’s skepticism was aroused once again, especially after learning that Stern, despite its claims, really did not know the identity of the East German source supplying the volumes. Reporters at the news conference announcing the “discovery” were also highly skeptical. So with suspicion skyrocketing, and facing possible charges of illegally circulating Nazi propaganda, Stern submitted three of the volumes to federal West German agencies for examination, whereupon the diaries were definitively proclaimed fake. Hitler’s purported signature was not accurate, the paper and ink were postwar productions, the bindings had been artificially “aged” with tea, the entries were filled with Hitler’s known stylistic clichés, they referred to “facts” that simply were not available to the dictator, and they were riddled with factual errors. The forger had even mistakenly affixed the initials “FH” on the diary covers instead of “AH,” having been confused by the elaborate Gothic initials that he used. Moreover, former German officers who had served as aides to Hitler attested that Hitler did not keep a diary to begin with and, especially at the end of the war, would not have had time to do so, to say nothing of the fact that after the bombing assassination attempt on his life in 1944 Hitler had effectively lost the use of his writing hand.
Stern’s credibility was severely damaged by the scandal, and two of its top two editors were forced to resign. Murdoch’s Times had an editorial shakeup as well, with Giles being forced to resign, and demanded its money back from the German magazine. Trever-Roper’s reputation was permanently tainted by the scandal. Kujau, the forger, along with the Stern reporter, Gerd Heidemann, who had brokered the deal and skimmed money from Stern’s payment that was due to the forger, were both arrested, found guilty of theft and fraud, and sentenced to four and a half years in prison. Kujau confessed to the hoax, even proving his guilt by composing his confession in the style of Hitler’s handwriting.
Upon his release from prison after serving three years of his sentence, Kujau, who died in 2000, opened a gallery in Stuttgart that sold his “genuine forgeries” of paintings by Hitler, Rembrandt, Dali, Monet, Van Gogh, and other masters. He signed the paintings in both his name and in the name of the original artist, and the works sold for tens of thousands of dollars. So popular were his reproductions that counterfeit Kujaus of Kujau’s fakes soon hit the market.
Only in 2012 did Murdoch admit his error in pressing to publish the diaries, saying, “It was a major mistake and one I shall have to live with for the rest of my life.” In 2013, coincidentally the 30th anniversary of the scandal, Stern donated the Hitler diaries to the German Federal Archives, a spokesperson for which noted, perhaps wryly, “These documents are of great significance to past history and the history of the press.”


" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">