Escobedo v. Illinois
Quick Summary
In the U.S. legal system, Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) is a landmark Supreme Court case that significantly impacted the rights of individuals during police interrogations. The Court ruled that the police must allow a suspect to consult with an attorney if they request one, especially when the interrogation shifts from a general inquiry to a targeted effort to elicit a confession. This decision was influenced by a study exposing police practices of prolonged detention aimed at obtaining confessions.12
The Escobedo ruling, along with Miranda v. Arizona, established crucial safeguards rooted in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. The Fifth Amendment protects the right to remain silent, while the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to legal counsel. These protections ensure that individuals are aware of their rights, including the right to an attorney and the right to remain silent, before and during police interrogations.31
Ask Britannica AI about this topic
Britannica doesn't have a full article on this topic, so we've curated a list of our relevant coverage.
arrest…States, Supreme Court decisions in Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966) called for the exclusion of many types of evidence if the arresting officers failed to advise the suspect of his constitutional right not to answer any questions and to have an attorney present during such questioning.…
Read More…States, Supreme Court decisions in Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966) called for the exclusion of many types of evidence if the arresting officers failed to advise the suspect of his constitutional right not to answer any questions and to have an attorney present during such questioning.…
Read More- interrogation
In Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) and Miranda v. Arizona (q.v.), (1966), the Supreme Court required that the police inform a suspected person of his right to remain silent and of his right to have legal counsel present at his interrogation. These decisions were criticized as having…
Read MoreIn Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) and Miranda v. Arizona (q.v.), (1966), the Supreme Court required that the police inform a suspected person of his right to remain silent and of his right to have legal counsel present at his interrogation. These decisions were criticized as having…
Read More