Whatâs the Difference Between a Frog and a Toad?
Youâre on a walk through the woods when a small brown and green creature hops across your path. Careful not to step on it, you lean down to get a closer look.
Did you spot a frog or a toad?
Though differentiating between frogs and toads can be difficult, there are a few features that may help you on your way to amphibian identification.
First is the creatureâs skin. If the skin is smooth and moist, youâre likely looking at a frog. If itâs dry, rough, and bumpy, youâre likely looking at a toad. Though the idea of contracting warts from touching a toad is entirely untrue, remembering it may prove helpful. The bumps on a toadâs back wonât give you a skin condition, but they do look warty, which provides a clue that what youâre looking at is probably a toad rather than a frog.
Another hint is the animalâs location. Since frogs need to keep their skin moist, theyâre often found near water. Their breeding usually takes place in fresh water, too, and a cluster of eggs floating on the surface of a pond or attached to a water plant may be a sign that a frog is nearby. Many kinds of toads, on the other hand, donât need the security a nearby body of water provides, as their skin tends to be better at retaining the moisture it needs than frogsâ skin. If thereâs no pond, lake, or stream nearby, youâre likely looking at a toad.
Finally, you may want to take a look at the critterâs legs. The hind legs of many kinds of frogs show that the animals live mostly in the water. Theyâre longer than the head and body, giving frogs the ability to leap far over ground and swim fast through water. In contrast, the hind legs of many kinds of toads are shorter than the head and body, and the animals look squat and rotund. Transporting themselves with small hops, toads may even look at times as if theyâre crawling. (A few kinds of frogs and toads actually do transport themselves by walking rather than hopping or leaping.)
If you already knew these facts and still canât tell a toad from a frog, thereâs no need to feel embarrassed. Thereâs a reason the two creatures seem so similar: frogs and toads are both tailless amphibians belonging to the order Anura. And thatâs not all. Frog and toad arenât exactly immutable categories. Thereâs no taxonomic basis for these labels. When it comes down to it, all toads actually fit in the category of frogs. The differences people have long used to separate anurans into these two groups are mostly superficial.
While frog is a term usually applied to anurans with long hind legs and smooth mucus-covered skin, a number of creatures identified as frogs have atypical features that complicate identification. Sedge frogs (family Hyperoliidae), for example, are one of the few frog varieties with adhesive toe disks to aid climbing, and flying frogs of the Rhacophoridae family can use expanded webbing between their toes to glide 12 to 15 metres (40 to 50 feet) through the air.
The same sort of variation is present in the toad category. Anurans of some 30 different genera are gathered under that category without being âtrue toadsâ (only members of the family Bufonidae are granted that honour). One variety of âuntrueâ toad even bears live youngâone of very few anurans to do so. Toad is such a wobbly descriptor, in fact, that one member of a family may be called a frog while another is called a toad. Within the Brachycephalidae family, for instance, is a species (Brachycephalus didactylus) that goes by the names Brazilian gold frog, Brazilian flea frog, Brazilian flea toad, and Izecksohnâs toad.
So, in light of all that, thereâs actually no surefire way to tell the difference between a frog and a toad. But more often than not, the three differentiating features weâve covered will get you close to the mark. The anurans wonât mind if you call a few frogs âtoadsâ in the process.