Did the Beatles Really Say They Were More Popular than Jesus?
In March 1966 Maureen Cleave, a reporter and friend of Beatles member John Lennon, published a profile in the London Evening Standard: âHow does a Beatle live? John Lennon lives like this.â In the profile the 25-year-old Lennon discussed his strained relationship with his father, the toys he bought with his still relatively new wealth, including a gorilla suit and five television sets, and the fact that sex was the only physical exercise that interested him anymore. (It was rumored, though never confirmed, that Lennon and Cleave were having an affair.) Lennonâs comments about Christianity, which were to become so sensational in a few months, did not seem especially notable in such a mix.
âChristianity will go,â Lennon said, according to Cleaveâs article. âIt will vanish and shrink. I neednât argue about that; Iâm right and I will be proved right. Weâre more popular than Jesus now; I donât know which will go firstârock ânâ roll or Christianity. Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. Itâs them twisting it that ruins it for me.â As Cleave noted in the profile, Lennon had been using his time off from Beatles commitments to read about religion.
The remarks proved uncontroversial upon their publication in England, where the term âChristianityâ was highly associated with the Church of England, a denomination many felt had become antiquated and outdated. When the profile was republished by other global newspapers, including The New York Times, the quote was again largely ignored.
It was not until Lennonâs comments were reprinted in a July issue of Datebook, a U.S. teen magazine with a political edge, that it began to gain attention. Birmingham, Alabama, radio hosts Tommy Charles and Doug Layton derided the comment on-air as âblasphemousâ and proposed a âBan the Beatlesâ campaign, refusing to play the bandâs music in response. Likely attempting to portray himself as a moral arbiter rather than a shock jock, Charles said, âBecause of their tremendous popularity throughout the world, especially with the younger set, [the Beatles] have been able to say what they wanted to without any regard for judgment, maturity, or the meaning of it, and no one has challenged them to any degree.â
From there, the manager of the Birmingham office of United Press International, Al Benn, published a story about the Beatles Boycott, shocking Evangelical Southern audiences. Dozens of radio hosts joined Charles and Layton in refusing to play the Beatlesâ music, some even going so far as to smash the bandâs records on-airâa stunt that escalated when other Southern radio stations began to conduct mass burnings of the albums. The South Carolina Ku Klux Klan even became involved, nailing the Beatlesâ records to a cross before setting it on fire.
Lennon initially refused to comment on the controversy, though others, such as Cleave and Beatles manager Brian Epstein, did so for him. âJohn was certainly not comparing the Beatles to Christ,â Cleave clarified in a statement to the press. âHe was simply observing that, so weak was the state of Christianity, the Beatles was, to many people, better known.â Epstein considered canceling the bandâs upcoming United States tour if it might put them in danger from angry audiences, even offering to cover the $1 million loss himself.
Though Epstein extended the opportunity for American venues to cancel upcoming appearances by the Beatles, none did. When the band arrived in Chicago in August 1966, Lennon held a press conference to publicly apologize. âI never meant it to be a lousy anti-religious thing,â Lennon said. âI apologize if that will make you happy. I still donât know quite what Iâve done. Iâve tried to tell you what I did do, but if you want me to apologize, if that will make you happy, thenâokay, Iâm sorry.â
Though Lennonâs apology put much of the blame on those who had misinterpreted his remarks rather than himself, they still resulted in the desired outcome: most of the anti-Beatles fervor across the country died down. Small crowds of religious protestors and members of the Ku Klux Klan still greeted the band at Southern shows, however, and the tour proved to be the Beatlesâ last. The realization that even a beloved band could be met with controversy and violence, combined with the bandâs fatigue after three years of Beatlemania, signaled a turning point. With the exception of a few live performances, the Beatles were a studio unit only from then on.