- In full:
- Bowl Championship Series
- Related Topics:
- American football
- Fiesta Bowl
- Rose Bowl
- Sugar Bowl
- Orange Bowl
BCS
-
What does BCS stand for in football?
In college football, BCS stands for Bowl Championship Series. It was an arrangement used to determine the national champion from 1998 until it was replaced in 2014 by the College Football Playoff.
The BCS utilized a ranking system that took into account the USA Today Coaches Poll, the Harris Interactive College Football Poll, and an average of six computer rankings. The top two teams at the end of the regular season would then meet in the BCS National Championship Game.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What was the main purpose of the BCS in college football?
The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) was created in 1998 to produce a national championship matchup based on a combination of computer rankings and polls. It was designed to match the two top-rated teams in a championship game, rotating among the Rose, Orange, Sugar, and Fiesta bowls.
The BCS aimed to resolve the ongoing controversy about the inability of bowl games to produce an unambiguous national champion. However, it faced increasing criticism from fans and media who wanted a playoff system to determine a clear-cut national champion. The BCS was replaced by the four-team College Football Playoff in 2014.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did the BCS determine which teams played in the national championship game?
The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) determined national championship game participants through a ranking system with three equally weighted components: the USA Today Coaches Poll, the Harris Interactive College Football Poll, and an average of six computer rankings. The top two teams in the rankings at the end of the regular season met in the BCS National Championship Game.
Champions of six "major conferences" (American Athletic, Atlantic Coast, Big 12, Big Ten, Pacific-12, and Southeastern) received automatic bids, along with at-large teams selected by individual bowl committees. A team from the five other Football Bowl Subdivision conferences could earn an automatic bid by ranking in the top 12. Similarly, Notre Dame could receive an automatic bid if ranked in the top eight. The College Football Playoff replaced the BCS in 2014.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What factors or rankings were used by the BCS to select top teams?
The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) used a ranking system to determine which teams participated in the BCS National Championship Game. The rankings had three equally weighted components: the USA Today Coaches Poll, the Harris Interactive College Football Poll, and an average of six computer rankings.
To be selected for a BCS bowl game, teams had to be drawn from the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The BCS gave automatic bids to the champions of the six major conferences (American Athletic, Atlantic Coast, Big 12, Big Ten, Pacific-12, and Southeastern) and four at-large teams.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why did some people criticize the BCS system?
The Bowl Championship Series (BCS), established in 1998 to determine college football's national champion, faced increasing criticism from fans and media who wanted a playoff system. Critics argued that the BCS selection method was subjective and profit-motivated, and that it often left out deserving teams.
Many believed a playoff system was the only fair way to determine a national champion. The BCS also faced criticism for not including teams from smaller, non-BCS conferences in championship games, even if they had undefeated seasons. Public desire for a playoff system, along with criticism of corruption within the bowl system, led to the creation of the four-team College Football Playoff in 2014, which replaced the BCS.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What replaced the BCS, and how is it different?
The College Football Playoff (CFP) replaced the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) in 2014 as the annual series of U.S. college football postseason bowl games that determines the national champion of the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA).
The BCS, created in 1998, used a combination of computer rankings and polls to determine the two teams that would compete in the national championship game. Criticism from fans and the media led to the creation of a playoff system to determine a clear national champion. The CFP originally featured four teams, but expanded to 12 teams for the 2024-2025 season.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
BCS, former arrangement of five American college postseason football games that annually determined the national champion. The games involved were the Rose Bowl, the Orange Bowl, the Sugar Bowl, the Fiesta Bowl, and the BCS National Championship Game. In 2014 the BCS was replaced by the College Football Playoff.
(Read Walter Campâs 1903 Britannica essay on inventing American football.)
The teams that participated in the BCS were drawn from the Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS; formerly known as Division I-A) of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and were determined by a ranking system that consisted of three equally weighted components: the USA Today Coachesâ Poll, the Harris Interactive College Football Poll, and an average of six computer rankings. The two teams that topped the rankings at the end of the regular season met in the BCS National Championship Game, which rotated its location between the sites of the four bowls and took place a few days after the bowl game that is traditionally held at that site. The 10 BCS participants were selected by the individual bowl committees from a pool that consisted of the automatically qualifying champions of the six âmajor conferencesâ (the American Athletic, Atlantic Coast, Big 12, Big Ten, Pacific-12, and Southeastern conferences) and four at-large teams. There was also a stipulation that awards automatic BCS berthsâat the expense of major conference at-large selectionsâto members of the five other conferences in the FBS if they were among the top 12 teams in the final BCS rankings. Moreover, by special arrangement, if the University of Notre Dame, a traditional football power that has no conference affiliation, was among the top eight teams in the final BCS rankings, it too received an automatic berth.
The BCS was the first true postseason football championship arrangement in the history of the NCAAâs highest division. Since the 1970s the NCAAâs lower divisionsâthe Football Championship Subdivision (formerly Division I-AA), Division II, and Division IIIâand the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA) have determined their national champions through single-elimination tournaments with fields ranging from 16 to 32 teams. Before the advent of the BCS, the title of Division I-A ânational championâ was bestowed on the team (or teams) that ended the season atop one of the polls taken of a fixed pool of coaches or sportswriters. Conventionally, the teams ranked first in the Associated Press (AP), United Press International (UPI), and coachesâ polls were given the greatest claim to the title, but various other polls also named national champions throughout the years. As a result, many seasons ended with split national champions. Because of contractual obligations between bowl games and conferences, postseason matchups between the two consensus top-ranked teams occurred in only 8 of the 57 seasons between 1936 (the first year of the AP poll) and 1992.
Precursors to the BCS were established in 1992 and 1995. The 1992 arrangement, known as the Bowl Coalition, instituted a selection process for four bowl gamesâthe Cotton, Fiesta, Orange, and Sugar bowlsâfrom among Atlantic Coast, Big East (precursor of the American Athletic Conference), Big 8 (precursor of the Big 12), Southeastern, and Southwest conferences, as well as Notre Dame, that eliminated some conference-bowl affiliations in an attempt to facilitate more prestigious postseason matchups. The effectiveness of the Bowl Coalition was limited, howeverâfirst and foremost by exclusion of the Big Ten and Pacific-10 (precursor of the Pacific-12) champions, which remained obligated to the Rose Bowl, but also by conference-bowl obligations that provided finite opportunities for matchups between the two top-ranked teams. This structure produced two de facto national championship games in the Bowl Coalitionâs three years of existence, but another arrangementâthe Bowl Alliance, instituted in 1995âeliminated all bowl affiliations for the five participating conferences and for Notre Dame and removed the Cotton Bowl from the scheme (because of the planned dissolution in 1996 of the Southwest Conference, to which the bowl had long been tied). The new agreement produced a matchup between the two top-ranked teams in its first year, but the continued absence of the Big Ten and Pacific-10 conferences from the Bowl Alliance prevented true number one versus number two pairings in the next two seasons. These two conferences (along with the Rose Bowl) joined with the Bowl Alliance institutions and bowls in 1998 to form the BCS. Through the first eight years of the BCS, each bowl game hosted the national championship game every fourth year, but in 2006 an additional stand-alone championship game was created.
While the BCS and its forerunners produced matchups of the two top-ranked teams in the coachesâ poll in 10 of the first 16 years of the system, the arrangements were not without controversy. In 2003, because of its relatively low computer rankings, the University of Southern California was not selected to play in the national championship game despite having ended the regular season atop both the AP and coachesâ polls. This resulted in the only split championship in the BCS era and led to the replacement of the AP poll by the Harris poll in the BCS formula.
From its creation in 1998, the BCS came under increasing criticism from fans and media who agitated for a play-off system that would provide a clear-cut national champion. The bowl committees and many conference administrators resisted change, arguing that the BCS be kept principally because of the long-standing bowl tradition (more than 30 games played from just before Christmas to just after New Yearâs Day, usually in warm locales, attracting hundreds of thousands of vacationing fans) and because the lack of a play-off increased the importance of college footballâs regular season. Often unspoken was the great financial windfall provided by the bowls, which was occasionally supplemented by illegal bribes and other improprieties among bowl officials and local politicians, most notably in the case of an expenditure scandal that led to the firing of the Fiesta Bowlâs CEO in 2011. However, public desire for a play-offâas well as criticism of the bowl systemâs corruptionâgrew so pronounced that a committee of university presidents replaced the BCS with a four-team College Football Playoff in 2014 in an attempt to crown more-definitive national champions.
A list of FBS college football national champions is provided in the table.
| season | champion |
|---|---|
| *National champion determined by various polls until the introduction of the BCS system in 1998; BCS system replaced with the College Football Playoff system in 2014â15. | |
| **Southern California won the BCS championship but had its title stripped in 2011 because of rules violations committed during the 2004 and 2005 seasons. | |
| 1924 | Notre Dame |
| 1925 | Dartmouth |
| 1926 | Stanford |
| 1927 | Illinois |
| 1928 | Southern California |
| 1929 | Notre Dame |
| 1930 | Notre Dame |
| 1931 | Southern California |
| 1932 | Michigan |
| 1933 | Michigan |
| 1934 | Minnesota |
| 1935 | Southern Methodist |
| 1936 | Minnesota |
| 1937 | Pittsburgh |
| 1938 | Texas Christian |
| 1939 | Texas A&M |
| 1940 | Minnesota |
| 1941 | Minnesota |
| 1942 | Ohio State |
| 1943 | Notre Dame |
| 1944 | Army |
| 1945 | Army |
| 1946 | Notre Dame |
| 1947 | Notre Dame |
| 1948 | Michigan |
| 1949 | Notre Dame |
| 1950 | Oklahoma |
| 1951 | Tennessee |
| 1952 | Michigan State |
| 1953 | Maryland |
| 1954 | Ohio State (AP), UCLA (UP) |
| 1955 | Oklahoma |
| 1956 | Oklahoma |
| 1957 | Auburn (AP), Ohio State (UP) |
| 1958 | Louisiana State |
| 1959 | Syracuse |
| 1960 | Minnesota |
| 1961 | Alabama |
| 1962 | Southern California |
| 1963 | Texas |
| 1964 | Alabama |
| 1965 | Alabama (AP), Michigan State (UPI) |
| 1966 | Notre Dame |
| 1967 | Southern California |
| 1968 | Ohio State |
| 1969 | Texas |
| 1970 | Nebraska (AP), Texas (UPI) |
| 1971 | Nebraska |
| 1972 | Southern California |
| 1973 | Notre Dame (AP), Alabama (UPI) |
| 1974 | Oklahoma (AP), Southern California (UPI) |
| 1975 | Oklahoma |
| 1976 | Pittsburgh |
| 1977 | Notre Dame |
| 1978 | Alabama (AP), Southern California (UPI) |
| 1979 | Alabama |
| 1980 | Georgia |
| 1981 | Clemson |
| 1982 | Penn State |
| 1983 | Miami (Fla.) |
| 1984 | Brigham Young |
| 1985 | Oklahoma |
| 1986 | Penn State |
| 1987 | Miami (Fla.) |
| 1988 | Notre Dame |
| 1989 | Miami (Fla.) |
| 1990 | Colorado (AP), Georgia Tech (UPI) |
| 1991 | Miami (Fla.; AP), Washington (UPI) |
| 1992 | Alabama |
| 1993â94 | Florida State |
| 1994â95 | Nebraska |
| 1995â96 | Nebraska |
| 1996â97 | Florida |
| 1997â98 | Michigan (AP), Nebraska (USA Today/ESPN) |
| 1998â99 | Tennessee |
| 1999â2000 | Florida State |
| 2000â01 | Oklahoma |
| 2001â02 | Miami (Fla.) |
| 2002â03 | Ohio State |
| 2003â04 | Louisiana State (BCS), Southern California (AP) |
| 2004â05 | vacated** |
| 2005â06 | Texas |
| 2006â07 | Florida |
| 2007â08 | Louisiana State |
| 2008â09 | Florida |
| 2009â10 | Alabama |
| 2010â11 | Auburn |
| 2011â12 | Alabama |
| 2012â13 | Alabama |
| 2013â14 | Florida State |
| 2014â15 | Ohio State |
| 2015â16 | Alabama |
| 2016â17 | Clemson |
| 2017â18 | Alabama |
| 2018â19 | Clemson |
| 2019â20 | Louisiana State |
| 2020â21 | Alabama |
| 2021â22 | Georgia |
| 2022â23 | Georgia |
| 2023â24 | Michigan |
| 2024â25 | Ohio State |
| 2025â26 | Indiana |