- Key People:
- Hugo de Vries
- Wilhelm Ludvig Johannsen
- Related Topics:
- evolution
mutation theory
-
What is a mutation in biology?
In biology, a mutation is an alteration in the genetic material (genome) of a cell or virus that is permanent and can be passed on to its descendants. Mutations can result from accidents during DNA's normal chemical transactions or from exposure to radiation or reactive chemicals.
Mutation theory posits that new species arise suddenly through alterations in their traits. Hugo de Vries introduced this theory, suggesting that species change into new ones due to the formation of new variations. De Vries's theory addresses gaps in the fossil record by suggesting that transitional stages are absent because new species form without prior precedent.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How can mutations occur in living things?
Mutations, alterations in an organism's genetic material, can occur through various mechanisms. These changes can be small, like a point mutation where a single DNA base is altered, or large, like chromosomal mutations affecting entire DNA molecules.
Point mutations include base substitutions, insertions, or deletions of nucleotide pairs. Larger-scale mutations involve deletions, duplications, inversions, or translocations of genes. Mutations can also arise from mobile DNA elements moving within the genome.
These mutations can happen spontaneously during DNA replication or be induced by external factors such as radiation, certain chemicals, or viruses. While many mutations are harmful, some can be beneficial, providing genetic variation that drives evolution.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is mutation theory in biology?
The mutation theory, introduced by Hugo de Vries in the early 20th century, posits that new species arise suddenly through alterations in their traits. De Vries's work Die Mutationstheorie (1901–03) combined saltationist and Darwinian ideas, suggesting that species evolve rapidly via discontinuous transformations, with all variations benefiting the species by improving adaptation to varied environments.
De Vries proposed that mutations cause a species to change into another due to a "new center of analogous variations". Unlike neo-Lamarckism, the mutation theory emphasizes discontinuous variations such as dwarfism and albinism. De Vries observed the common evening primrose, Oenothera lamarckiana, noting offspring with significantly different traits that sometimes could not interbreed with parent generations. He argued that new species emerge fully formed but lack the parent generation's characteristics.
The mutation theory addresses gaps in the fossil record by suggesting that these gaps do not represent missing transitional stages but instead support a Mendelian and saltationist view of evolution. Other theories, such as Richard Goldschmidt’s "hopeful monsters" and Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge’s punctuated equilibrium, also support saltationist species formation, reinforcing the idea that all variations can be beneficial.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who developed the original mutation theory and why?
Hugo de Vries, a Dutch botanist and geneticist, developed the original mutation theory at the beginning of the 20th century. He introduced it in his Die Mutationstheorie (1901–03). De Vries aimed to address what he saw as a key deficiency in Darwinian analysis regarding the incompleteness of the fossil record.
De Vries's theory posited that new species arise suddenly through mutations, which he defined as the change of one species into another due to the formation of a new center of analogous variations. His work was based on observations of the common evening primrose, where he noted offspring with significantly different traits from their parents.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How does mutation theory explain evolution and new species?
Mutation theory, pioneered by Hugo de Vries, posits that new species arise abruptly via significant alterations in traits, challenging the Darwinian view of gradual change. De Vries observed in the common evening primrose that new species could emerge fully formed through mutation, differing markedly from their parents and sometimes being reproductively incompatible.
Mutation theory addresses gaps in the fossil record by suggesting that transitional stages are absent because species originate through discontinuous variations. Mutations, alterations in an organism's genetic material, can result from errors during DNA replication or exposure to radiation and certain chemicals. While many mutations are harmful, some can be beneficial, driving evolution through natural selection. These mutations can range from point mutations, affecting single base pairs, to chromosomal mutations, involving multiple genes.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How is mutation theory different from Darwin’s theory of natural selection?
Mutation theory, pioneered by Hugo de Vries, posits that new species arise abruptly through mutations, which are sudden, significant alterations in traits. This contrasts with Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection, where species evolve gradually through the accumulation of small variations over long periods.
De Vries observed instances of discontinuous variations, such as dwarfism, giantism, and albinism, and argued that new species emerge fully formed but lacking parental characteristics. Unlike Darwin's emphasis on gradual change, mutation theory highlights the creative force of discontinuity in the origin of new species. Darwin's theory emphasizes that natural selection results in the adaptation of an organism to its environment by selectively reproducing changes in its genotype, or genetic constitution.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
mutation theory, idea that new species are formed from the sudden and unexpected emergence of alterations in their defining traits. Advanced at the beginning of the 20th century by Dutch botanist and geneticist Hugo de Vries in his Die Mutationstheorie (1901–03; The Mutation Theory), mutation theory joined two seemingly opposed traditions of evolutionary thought. First, its practitioners, often referred to as mutationists, accepted the primary contention of saltationist theory, which argued that new species are produced rapidly through discontinuous transformations. Saltationist theory contradicted Darwinism, which held that species evolved through the gradual accumulation of variation over vast epochs. Second, mutationists tended to hold the strict Darwinian line that all differentiation is for the good of the species, which differed from the saltationist idea that some organismic variations are inherently undesirable. The second argument was premised on the belief that more variation provided better opportunities for adaptation to a variable environment. The dovetailing of seemingly antithetical traditions made mutation theory one of the vanguard movements in early 20th-century evolutionary and genetic theory.
De Vries held that new species arrive suddenly and without prior precedent through the process of mutation, which he considered to be the change of one species into another due to the formation of “a new center of analogous variations.” Rather than simply argue that species are discontinuous from each other—as in the case of neo-Lamarckism—mutation theory suggested that variations themselves are discontinuous, as in the cases of dwarfism, giantism, and albinism. Based on his observations of common evening primrose (Oenothera lamarckiana), which occasionally spawns offspring that differ significantly in leaf traits and overall size from parent generations and that sometimes cannot be crossed with parent generations, de Vries argued that new species came into existence fully formed and viable but lacking the defining characteristics of the parent generation. Thus, de Vries’s analysis focused on the creative force of discontinuity as a prime explanation for the origin of new species.
Mutation theory attempted to address a key lack in Darwinian analysis with respect to the incompleteness of the fossil record. Rather than insist that knowledge of the fossil record is insufficient to identify transitional stages in the gradual accumulation of incremental variations over time, de Vries’s mutation theory insisted that no such gaps in the genealogical trees of organisms existed. Thus, what appeared to be absences in the fossil record could be marshaled as evidence in favour of a Mendelian and saltationist-based theory of evolution.
" height="20" alt="HEW Logo">
Other mutationist theories were developed after de Vries’s work, including German-born American geneticist Richard Goldschmidt’s “hopeful monsters” theory and American paleontologists Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge’s punctuated equilibrium theory. Those ideas not only remained faithful to the saltationist basis for new species formation but also championed de Vries’s devotion to the pure Darwinian belief that allvariation proves beneficial. In doing so, mutationist theories recognized alternative viable organismic formations (often labeled “disabilities” at the human level) as examples of the creative force of new species coming into existence through mutation. That interpretation contradicted assertions by eugenicists and geneticists that some mutations are monstrosities or organismic abominations.