equant
Quick Summary
The term "equant" in astronomy refers to a point used in the Ptolemaic system, a geocentric model of the universe developed by Ptolemy around 150 CE. This system assumed Earth was stationary at the center of the universe. To explain the observed irregular movements of planets, Ptolemy's model combined circular motions. The equant was a key artifact in this model, allowing the center of a planet's epicycle (a small circle on which the planet moves) to sweep out equal angles in equal times as seen from the equant point. This point was located midway between the center of the deferent (the larger circle around Earth) and Earth itself. While the equant helped accurately predict planetary motion, it was controversial and later challenged by astronomers like Copernicus and Kepler, whose work eventually led to the heliocentric model and elliptical orbits.1
Ask Britannica AI about this topic
Britannica doesn't have a full article on this topic, so we've curated a list of our relevant coverage.
astronomyPtolemy…in the Almagest is the equant point. As in the planetary theories of Hipparchus’s day, a planet travels uniformly around its epicycle while the centre of the epicycle moves around Earth on an off-centre circle. But in Ptolemy’s theory the motion of the epicycle’s centre is nonuniform—it speeds up and…
Read More…in the Almagest is the equant point. As in the planetary theories of Hipparchus’s day, a planet travels uniformly around its epicycle while the centre of the epicycle moves around Earth on an off-centre circle. But in Ptolemy’s theory the motion of the epicycle’s centre is nonuniform—it speeds up and…
Read More
astronomyThe Islamic worldIbn al-Haytham criticized the equant point in Shukūk ʿalā Baṭlamyūs (“Doubts About Ptolemy”). Ibn al-Haytham also objected to Ptolemy’s habit of defining motions with respect to immaterial points and lines as if they were real material bodies. (Complaints about the artificiality of Ptolemy’s constructions had been made even in…
Read MoreIbn al-Haytham criticized the equant point in Shukūk ʿalā Baṭlamyūs (“Doubts About Ptolemy”). Ibn al-Haytham also objected to Ptolemy’s habit of defining motions with respect to immaterial points and lines as if they were real material bodies. (Complaints about the artificiality of Ptolemy’s constructions had been made even in…
Read More

