Britannica AI Icon
Adding us as a Preferred Source tells Google you trust our content, so our articles show up more often in your Google Search, Discover feed, and AI Overviews.
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

Despite extensive investigation, the manner in which the COVID-19 pandemic started is yet undetermined. The leading hypothesis centers on the idea that SARS-CoV-2, the causative virus, originated in animals then emerged humans following an event related to zoonotic spillover.

What is zoonotic spillover?

Pathogens that exist in animals sometimes develop the ability to infect humans, typically through genetic changes. This process, known as zoonotic spillover, can occur when humans come into direct contact with wildlife or domestic animals or intermediate animal hosts that carry the pathogen. The origins of many infectious diseases—prominent examples being influenza, Ebola, HIV/AIDS, and SARS—lie in zoonotic spillover. Hence, this mechanism represents a critical avenue by which new human diseases arise.

What evidence supports a zoonotic origin?

The are several key pieces of scientific evidence that support the idea that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through zoonotic spillover. In particular, genetic analyses classify the virus as a coronavirus, specifically within a group found naturally in horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus); these bat species inhabit areas across southern, southwestern, and eastern regions of China. Viruses from these species of bats have genetic sequences that are up to 96 percent identical to the human virus. Closely related coronaviruses, however, have also been detected in other wild mammals, among them pangolins, civets, and raccoon dogs. These animals are commonly traded in live animal (“wet”) markets in China and other Asian countries.

Many of the earliest known COVID-19 cases were in fact associated with the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, China, where live wild mammals susceptible to coronaviruses were sold before the pandemic. Environmental samples collected from the market, specifically in areas where wildlife sales were predominant, contained SARS-CoV-2 genetic material. In addition, the way in initial cases occurred in clusters within the market and the distribution of the earliest viral lineages, is consistent with the likelihood that several separate animal-to-human spillover events took place in late 2019. Thus, the genetic, epidemiological, and environmental findings collectively indicate that there was a natural zoonotic spillover in or around the market.

Why is the exact origin still uncertain?

Nonetheless, scientists have not identified the sequence events preceding the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 into human populations. In addition, no infected animal carrying a direct ancestral form of the virus has been identified. Because many months passed before the earliest cases were recognized, opportunities to collect definitive evidence from animals and environmental sources were limited. As a result, reconstructing the initial stages of the outbreak remains challenging.

Why does understanding the origin of COVID-19 matter?

The prevention of future pandemics relies on information from previous outbreaks, which is one reason why deciphering the origins of the COVID-19 began is important. Better understanding of ecological and environmental conditions that fuel the jump of animal viruses to humans can help improve wildlife surveillance, strengthen disease monitoring, and guide public health measures oriented toward lowering the likelihood of subsequent spillover events.