Teacher tenure

Introduction
Pros
- Pro 1: Tenure protects teachers from being fired for personal, political, or other non-work related reasons.
- Pro 2: Tenure prohibits school districts from firing experienced teachers to hire less experienced and less expensive teachers.
- Pro 3: Tenure protects teachers from being fired for teaching unpopular, controversial, or otherwise challenged curricula such as evolutionary biology and controversial literature.
- Pro 4: The promise of a secure and stable job attracts many teachers to the teaching profession, and eliminating teacher tenure would hamper teacher recruitment.
- Pro 5: Tenure helps guarantee innovation in teaching.
- Pro 6: Teacher tenure is a justifiable reward for several years of positive evaluations by school administrators.
- Pro 7: Tenure is a good system that has become a scapegoat for problems facing education.
- Pro 8: Tenure allows teachers to advocate on behalf of students and disagree openly with school and district administrators.
- Pro 9: Contrary to public perception, tenure does not guarantee a teacher a job for life.
- Pro 10: Tenure protects teachers from being prematurely fired after a student makes a false accusation or a parent threatens expensive legal action against the district.
- Pro 11: Tenure encourages the careful selection of qualified and effective teachers.
- Pro 12: The formal dismissal process guaranteed by tenure protects teachers from punitive evaluation systems and premature dismissal.
- Pro 13: Tenure allows teachers to work more effectively since they do not need to be in constant fear of losing their jobs.
Cons
- Con 1: Teacher tenure creates complacency because teachers know they are unlikely to lose their jobs.
- Con 2: Tenure makes it difficult to remove under-performing teachers because the process involves months of legal wrangling by the principal, the school board, the union, and the courts.
- Con 3: Tenure often makes seniority the main factor in dismissal decisions instead of teacher performance and quality.
- Con 4: Tenure is not needed to recruit teachers.
- Con 5: With job protections granted through court rulings, collective bargaining, and state and federal laws, teachers today no longer need tenure to protect them from dismissal.
- Con 6: Tenure makes it costly for schools to remove a teacher with poor performance or who is guilty of wrongdoing.
- Con 7: With most states granting tenure after three years, teachers have not had the opportunity to “show their worth, or their ineptitude.”
- Con 8: Tenure does not grant academic freedom. No Child Left Behind in 2001 took away much academic freedom when it placed so much emphasis on standardized testing.
- Con 9: Tenure at the K-12 level is not earned, but given to nearly everyone.
- Con 10: Tenure is unpopular among educators and the public.
- Con 11: Teacher tenure does nothing to promote the education of children.
- Con 12: Teacher tenure requires schools to make long-term spending commitments and prevents districts from being fiscally flexible.
- Con 13: Tenure lets experienced teachers pick easier assignments and leaves difficult assignments to the least experienced teachers.
Sources

References & Edit History Related Topics

Images

Teacher tenure: Media

Should teachers get tenure?

Images

Tenure

Tenure

Should teachers get tenure?

© Cagkan/stock.adobe.com

VIEW MORE in these related Britannica articles: