Fur clothing bans

Introduction
Pros
- Pro 1: Raising animals for fur is inhumane.
- Pro 2: The fur industry contributes to the destruction of the environment.
- Pro 3: Banning fur clothing, real or fake, will help legitimize humane fashion alternatives.
Cons
- Con 1: Animals raised for fur are humanely treated; abuse is the exception to the rule.
- Con 2: Fur alternatives are bad for the environment, while a humane fur industry is sustainable.
- Con 3: Consumers are opting for non-fur alternatives without bans, which harm related industries in Indigenous communities and the developing world.
Assessment quiz
1-minute survey
Discussion questions
Sources

References & Edit History Related Topics

Images

A gray chinchilla with large ears and thick fur sits on green grass, nibbling on a pile of hay, with blurred greenery in the background.

A European mink (Mustela lutreola) stands on smooth gray rocks holding a crab in its mouth.

Animal pelts including wolverine, fox, mink, badger, rabbit, and otter hang on a wooden rack outdoors beside tree trunks.

Fur clothing bans: Media

Should fur clothing be banned?

Images

A gray chinchilla with large ears and thick fur sits on green grass, nibbling on a pile of hay, with blurred greenery in the background.

Should fur clothing be banned?

A chinchilla is a South American medium-sized rodent hunted and raised for its extremely...

© Chernetskaya/Dreamstime.com

A European mink (Mustela lutreola) stands on smooth gray rocks holding a crab in its mouth.

Mink

European mink (Mustela lutreola) with a captured crab in its mouth.

© james smith—500Px Plus/Getty Images

Sable

Sable

Illustration of the animal.

Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

Animal pelts including wolverine, fox, mink, badger, rabbit, and otter hang on a wooden rack outdoors beside tree trunks.

Pelts

Fur animal pelts hanging on natural rack. Wolverine, fox, mink, badger, rabbit, and...

© SAKstock/Shutterstock.com

VIEW MORE in these related Britannica articles: