Robert Repino, editor of religious studies and history for Oxford University Press, stated:

“I think the reform should be implemented gradually. Religious organizations could be granted a few initial exceptions, especially for very small institutions. They could also receive a generous grace period—perhaps up to several years—to show that they are spending their revenue on their mission rather than squirreling it away or using it to buy their elders a new yacht. If an organization can’t get its act together by then, it probably deserves to be taxed. Or go out of business.

There’s a bigger picture to contemplate here, and it has to do with how we run a functional, compassionate society. A tax code that allows any institution—religious or not—to hoard money with no oversight should be considered a structural injustice. At the same time, an overreliance on religious institutions as charities discourages a more comprehensive system of direct aid and investment from government entities. (You know, the kind of social safety net that other stable democracies take for granted.) If an organization claims to stand for justice, yet continues to support this tax system, we must at least ask a few follow-up questions. The public discourse is already upon us, and it might get ugly. We can either leave it to the angriest voices in the room, or we can work out a fair solution.”

—Robert Repino, “Churches Shouldn’t Automatically Get Tax Exemptions,” sojo.net, Apr. 14, 2022

U.S. Representatives Suzan DelBene (Democrat, Washington) and Jared Huffman (Democrat, California), stated:

“We understand the importance of religious institutions to their congregants and believe that religious freedom is a cherished American value and constitutional right. We also believe that our tax code must be applied fairly and judiciously. Tax-exempt organizations should not be exploiting tax laws applicable to churches to avoid public accountability and the IRS’s examination of their activities.”

—Suzan DelBene, “DelBene, Huffman Call on IRS to Review Tax-Exempt ‘Church Status’ for Known Hate Group,” delbene.house.gov, Aug. 2, 2022

Paul Matzko, historian of American religion and politics, stated:

“Again, the history of religious land-use laws is enlightening here. Using the federal government to protect tax-exempt status for churches is not a recipe for a stable, long-term equilibrium. It only works as long as Christians can maintain a white-knuckled grip on power, fighting to maintain their tax advantages by tooth, claw, court case, and ballot. The gospels tell us to love our neighbors as ourselves. This is certainly a strange way of doing it. After all, why did Jesus, when asked if he owed taxes to Rome, say, “Give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s” (Mark 12:17)? It is far better to live peaceably with all people, giving “to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes” (Rom. 13:7).

It might not be such a bad thing to lose tax-exempt status. We should consider, at the very least, the cost of maintaining this kind of cultural privilege. The true church of God, after all, is not reliant on its special status in the tax code. We can walk by faith and not by government largess.”

—Paul Matzko, “The Hidden Cost of Tax Exemption,” christianitytoday.com, Jan. 6, 2020