Britannica
Sources used in this answer
Why did Ottoman sultans have less absolute power than they appeared to have?
Created from Britannica articles
using AI.
AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Ottoman Empire
Map showing the expansion of the Ottoman Empire from about 1300 to 1700. The empire reached its greatest extent between 1683 and 1699.
Although the Ottoman sultan was theoretically the absolute sovereign with the right to possess and exploit all wealth in the empire, his actual power was significantly constrained by the decentralized nature of the state and the influence of various institutions.1
Several factors contributed to this limitation of power:
- Institutional Autonomy: The empire delegated extensive administrative, social, and legal functions to religious communities (millets), guilds, and officials holding mukataa (revenue-generating units). These groups operated with significant independence, decentralizing authority away from the palace.1
- Legal Checks: While the sultan could issue secular laws (kanun), he was bound by the Sharīʿah. The ulama held the right to invalidate secular laws that contradicted religious principles.1
- Bureaucratic and Military Influence: As sultans increasingly isolated themselves from daily administration, power shifted to viziers, the Janissaries, and palace factions. In later periods, the harem and powerful figures like the valide sultan (mother of the sultan) exerted significant control, sometimes even engineering palace coups or regencies.123456
- Political Maneuvering: Sultans often lacked the means to control these competing factions, leading to periods where they were effectively sidelined by the very institutions meant to serve them.56