opportunity cost

Open full sized image

Which opportunity should you choose, and what are you giving up by doing so?

© DMegias, Julia/stock.adobe.com; Photo illustration Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.

In economics, opportunity cost refers to the potential benefit or gain that is given up when choosing one option over others. Introduced and formalized by Austrian economist Friedrich von Wieser in the late 19th century, the concept frames every decision as a trade-off, one in which there’s a hidden loss (or forfeited gain) embedded in the alternatives you didn’t choose.

Here’s a simple example. If you choose to spend $2,000 on a new television, you’re not just paying the sticker price. You also give up several other potential uses of that $2,000—such as paying down debt, investing in an asset that may grow in value (as opposed to a television, which usually depreciates), or buying other goods and services with different benefits.

If you’ve ever played The Game of Life, you know this one: It’s the choice between entering the workforce after high school or going to college. If you choose college, you delay earning by four (or more) years—and miss out on the job skills, experience, and seniority you might have gained by working. 

On the other hand, if you decide to enter the workforce right away, you give up the potential benefits of earning a college degree—specialized knowledge, professional networks, and credentials that can open doors to certain careers with higher, longer-term earnings potential.

Whether you’re a long-term buy-and-hold investor or an active day trader, every decision comes with trade-offs. Holding a losing stock or stubbornly sticking with a poorly timed or poorly executed trade can tie up capital that might be better used elsewhere. And the opportunity cost isn’t just financial—it can also tie up your mental capital, leading to stress, hesitation, and missed opportunities.

When it comes to building a portfolio, risk and reward often exist in tension, acting as each other’s opportunity cost. Reducing risk by holding safer assets such as Treasury securities or stable, dividend-paying stocks can mean giving up the potential for greater upside. On the other hand, pursuing higher returns with high-beta tech shares or high-yield (junk) bonds comes with more volatility and a greater chance of loss.

Opportunity cost is a key concept throughout finance and economics because it highlights the trade-offs behind every financial decision. For every potential gain, there are missed opportunities along the paths not taken.

That said, opportunity cost can be hard to quantify. It’s based on what could have happened, not what did.

A practical rule of thumb: Choose a path where the potential upside clearly outweighs the potential downside of the alternative, given your goals and objectives. For example, suppose you’re deciding between putting your money in an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the S&P 500 or an S&P 500 futures contract. Because futures contracts are bought and sold on margin, you can control more notional value with less capital. Margin trading offers outsize gains, but also exposes you to losses that could exceed your initial investment. With the ETF, the same amount of capital would buy fewer shares (i.e., control less notional value), but the risk and reward would be more moderate and well defined. Given these opportunity costs, the decision comes down to objectives. A short-term momentum trader may opt for the futures contract, while a buy-and-hold investor would likely opt for the ETF.

Every financial decision comes with a hidden price tag—that’s the opportunity cost in every trade-off. Before you make a choice in pretty much any aspect of your financial life, take a moment to consider what you’re giving up by not selecting another path. That small shift in thinking can help you better align your decisions with your risk tolerance, time horizon, and financial goals.