Britannica AI Icon
Adding us as a Preferred Source tells Google you trust our content, so our articles show up more often in your Google Search, Discover feed, and AI Overviews.
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

Stanford Prison Experiment

social psychology study
Top Questions

What are the ethical issues with the Stanford Prison Experiment?

What did the Stanford Prison Experiment tell us?

Why was the Stanford Prison Experiment controversial?

What happened to prisoner #8612 in the Stanford Prison Experiment?

What were the results of the Stanford Prison Experiment?

Why was the Stanford Prison Experiment ended?

What was the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment?

How were participants selected for the Stanford Prison Experiment?

News •

The Stanford Prison Experiment was a social psychology study in which college students became prisoners or guards in a simulated prison environment. The experiment, funded by the U.S. Office of Naval Research, took place at Stanford University in August 1971. It was intended to measure the effect of role-playing, labeling, and social expectations on behavior over a period of two weeks. However, mistreatment of prisoners escalated so alarmingly that the principal investigator, the American psychologist Philip G. Zimbardo, terminated the experiment after only six days.

Start of the experiment

More than 70 young men responded to an advertisement about a “psychological study of prison life,” and experimenters selected 24 applicants who were judged to be physically and mentally healthy and well adjusted. The paid subjects—they received $15 a day—were divided randomly into equal numbers of guards and prisoners. Guards were ordered not to physically abuse prisoners and were issued mirrored sunglasses that prevented any eye contact. Prisoners were “arrested” by actual police and handed over to the experimenters in a mock prison in the basement of a campus building. Prisoners were then subjected to indignities that were intended to simulate the environment of a real-life prison. In keeping with Zimbardo’s intention to create very quickly an “atmosphere of oppression,” each prisoner was made to wear a “dress” as a uniform and to carry a chain padlocked around one ankle. All participants were observed and videotaped by the experimenters.

Behaviors and shutdown

On only the second day the prisoners staged a rebellion that was put down by the guards. Guards then worked out a system of rewards and punishments to manage the prisoners. Within the first four days, three prisoners had become so traumatized that they were released. Over the course of the experiment, some of the guards became cruel and tyrannical, and a number of the prisoners became depressed and disoriented. However, only after an outside observer came upon the scene and registered shock did Zimbardo end the experiment, less than a week after it had started.

Discover the fascinating events that shaped the world, straight from our editors.
By clicking “Sign Up”, you consent to the Britannica Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The first prisoner to be released, Doug Korpi (known as prisoner #8612), had apparently begun to suffer very early in the experiment. He cried and screamed uncontrollably in despair and anger in reaction to his cruel and abusive mistreatment by prison guards. The director of the experiment at first denied Korpi’s request to be released, suspecting that he was only pretending, but then let him go on the second day of the experiment, as his behavior became even worse. Many years later, Korpi claimed in an interview that he had been faking his breakdown so that he could leave the experiment right away. Zimbardo, for his part, thought that Korpi was misremembering his own experience.

Evaluation, new experiment, and movies

Despite its early termination, the experiment seemed to show that the regular attitudes and behavior of normal persons could be dramatically altered by the social situations in which they find themselves. Zimbardo himself claimed that the experiment’s “social forces and environmental contingencies” had led the guards to behave badly. However, some critics claimed that the experiment showed only that the original advertisement had attracted people who were predisposed to authoritarianism. Others accused Zimbardo of encouraging the guards’ cruelty through his own actions. Zimbardo admitted that during the experiment he had sometimes felt more like a prison superintendent than a research psychologist.

The most conspicuous challenge to the Stanford findings came decades later in the form of the BBC Prison Study, a differently organized experiment documented in a British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) series called The Experiment (2002). The BBC’s mock prisoners turned out to be more assertive than Zimbardo’s. The British experimenters called the Stanford experiment “a study of what happens when a powerful authority figure (Zimbardo) imposes tyranny.”

The Stanford Prison Experiment also became widely known outside academia. It was the acknowledged inspiration for Das Experiment (2001), a German movie that was remade in the United States as the direct-to-video film The Experiment (2010). The Stanford Prison Experiment (2015) was created with Zimbardo’s active participation; the dramatic film more closely followed actual events.

Explore Britannica Premium!

The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.

SUBSCRIBE
Penguin, ship, mountain, atlas
shohei ohtani, plants, andy wharhol art
Mobile
The Editors of Encyclopaedia BritannicaThis article was most recently revised and updated by Brian Duignan.