- Date:
- June 5, 1950
- Location:
- Oklahoma
- United States
- Context:
- discrimination
- University of Oklahoma
- Key People:
- Thurgood Marshall
- Fred M. Vinson
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education
-
What was the McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education case?
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case addressing racial segregation in higher education. George W. McLaurin, an African American student, was denied admission to the University of Oklahoma due to his race, which violated Oklahoma law.
A federal court found that the state had to provide McLaurin with the education he sought once it was offered to students of other races. The state amended its statute to allow Black students to attend universities on a segregated basis.
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the university violated McLaurin’s Fourteenth Amendment rights by not providing equal education. The Court held that universities must treat all students equally, regardless of race, and that racial segregation impairs a student’s ability to learn.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who was George McLaurin and what did he want to do?
George W. McLaurin was an African American student with a master's degree who sought to pursue a doctorate in education at the University of Oklahoma. He was initially denied admission because Oklahoma law made it a misdemeanor to operate or attend an educational institution that admitted both white and Black students. McLaurin filed a complaint, arguing the statute was unconstitutional because it deprived him of equal protection under the law.
Following a court decision, Oklahoma amended the statute, allowing African Americans to attend educational institutions on a segregated basis. McLaurin was admitted but had to sit in designated areas in the classroom, library, and cafeteria.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did the University of Oklahoma treat George McLaurin differently because of his race?
In McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, George W. McLaurin, an African American with a master's degree, was initially denied admission to the University of Oklahoma solely because of his race. After a court ruling, the university admitted McLaurin but under segregated conditions.
Under an amended Oklahoma law, McLaurin had to sit in a special row in the classroom, had an assigned table in the library, and a designated table in the cafeteria. The university later removed the "Reserved for Colored" sign from his seat in the classroom and moved his library table to the main floor. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that such segregation within higher education institutions violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, ensuring African American students receive the same treatment as other students.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What was the main argument that McLaurin made against the university's actions?
In McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, George W. McLaurin, an African American student, argued that the restrictions imposed by the University of Oklahoma—such as segregated seating in classrooms, libraries, and cafeterias—violated the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause.
He contended these restrictions hindered his ability to learn and engage with other students and faculty, thus impairing his educational experience. The Supreme Court, agreeing with McLaurin, held that these restrictions created inequality by setting him apart from his peers and impeding his ability to exchange ideas and learn his chosen profession.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did the Supreme Court rule in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education?
In McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9–0) on June 5, 1950, that racial segregation within colleges and universities violates the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause.
George W. McLaurin, an African American student, was denied admission to the University of Oklahoma solely because of his race. Although a court declared the statute unconstitutional, Oklahoma amended it to allow Black students on a segregated basis. McLaurin was then admitted but had to sit in specific rows and at designated tables in the library and cafeteria.
The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's decision, stating that state officials must treat all students equally regardless of race. The Court recognized that racial discrimination has no place in education and that the restrictions impaired McLaurin's ability to study, discuss, and debate with peers and faculty, negatively impacting his educational experience. The Court concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits Oklahoma from treating African American students differently from others.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why was this decision important for the civil rights movement and segregation in schools?
The Supreme Court's unanimous ruling in McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education (1950) declared that racial segregation in colleges and universities violated the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause.
When George W. McLaurin, an African American student, was denied admission to the University of Oklahoma solely based on his race, he filed a complaint. The court found Oklahoma's statute unconstitutional, as it denied him equal protection under the law.
Oklahoma amended the statute, allowing African Americans into educational institutions on a segregated basis. McLaurin was admitted but had to sit in specific areas in the classroom, library, and cafeteria.
This decision, along with Sweatt v. Painter, mandated equal treatment for African American students in higher education, challenging segregation and advancing civil rights.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9–0), on June 5, 1950, that racial segregation within the facilities and institutions of colleges and universities is inconsistent with the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In this ruling and its companion case, Sweatt v. Painter, decided on the same day, the Supreme Court held that African American students must receive the same treatment as all other students in the realm of higher education.
Facts of the case
The litigation in McLaurin began to take shape when George W. McLaurin, an African American student with a master’s degree, applied for admission to the University of Oklahoma in pursuit of a doctorate in education but was denied entry solely because of his race. At the time, an Oklahoma law made it a misdemeanor to operate, teach at, or attend an educational institution that admitted both white and black students. The student filed a complaint for injunctive relief, claiming that the statute was unconstitutional because it deprived him of equal protection of the laws.
A three-judge federal trial court determined that officials in Oklahoma had a constitutional duty to provide the plaintiff with the education he wanted as soon as they offered the same to students of any other race. Although the court declared that the statute allowing officials to deny the student admission to the program was null and void, it refused to grant his request for an injunction, assuming that officials would follow the constitutional mandate in its order. Even so, the court retained jurisdiction of the case in order to provide the student with equal protection of the laws with regard to his education.
In response, legislators in Oklahoma amended the statute, permitting African Americans to be admitted to educational institutions provided that the instruction the institutions provided was “upon a segregated basis.” The student was then admitted to the graduate school of the University of Oklahoma, a state-funded institution.
As a result of the amended Oklahoma law, the plaintiff was assigned to sit in a row of classroom seats reserved for African American students, had to sit at an assigned table in the library, and, while he was allowed to eat in the cafeteria, he had a designated table.
During the time between the student’s filing of his appeal and the Supreme Court’s having conducted oral arguments, university officials modified their treatment of the plaintiff. The sign that hung around the student’s sites in the classroom stating “Reserved for Colored” was removed, and he was assigned to a table on the main floor of the library; his previous table was on the mezzanine level.
The Supreme Court’s ruling
On appeal, the Supreme Court focused on the question of whether officials could treat a student at a state university differently from other students based solely on his race. In a unanimous decision authored by Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s decision. The Supreme Court reasoned that, under the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause, state officials had the legal duty to treat the plaintiff in the same manner as students of other races.
The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.
SUBSCRIBE
Using sweeping language, the Supreme Court acknowledged that, because American society was changing, discrimination based on race had no place in education. In addition, the court ruled that, insofar as the restrictions that officials imposed on the student impaired and inhibited his ability to study and to engage in discussions and debates with other students as well as faculty, this treatment had a detrimental impact on his overall educational experience.
In its defense, the state of Oklahoma argued that the restrictions that officials had imposed on African American students were nominal, because the facilities had been made available to all students and the rooms assigned to the plaintiff had no disadvantages when compared with those used by other students. The court summarily dismissed this argument, noting that the treatment set the plaintiff apart from other students, because he was still restricted as to where he could sit. In fact, as the court noted, the restrictions were designed to comply with the state statute that had required officials in institutions of higher education to treat students differently based on their races. As a result, the court pointed out, the plaintiff was held back in pursuit of his education, because he was unable to debate and discuss his ideas with other students and faculty, with the result that his ability to learn his chosen profession, teaching, was hampered.
The Supreme Court also held that officials at the University of Oklahoma had violated the plaintiff’s right to equal protection of the laws by denying him an education that was equal to that of his peers. The court thus concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment precluded the enforcement of the Oklahoma statute that required African American students to be treated differently from other students.