- Date:
- 1894 - 1906
Dreyfus affair
-
What was the Dreyfus affair?
The Dreyfus affair was a political scandal that occurred from 1894 to 1906 in France during the Third Republic. The controversy centered on the treason conviction of Alfred Dreyfus, a French army captain, for allegedly selling military secrets to the Germans in 1894.
Initially, the public supported Dreyfus's conviction, influenced by anti-Semitic sentiments, with many believing Dreyfus, who was Jewish, symbolized disloyalty. However, as evidence emerged indicating Ferdinand Walsin-Esterhazy was the actual spy, doubts grew. Ămile Zola's publication of "J'Accuse!" in L'Aurore newspaper in 1898 protested the army's cover-up of its mistaken conviction of Dreyfus.
France became divided between those against reopening the case (anti-Dreyfusards) and those seeking exoneration of Captain Dreyfus (Dreyfusards). In 1899, a new court-martial found Dreyfus guilty, but he was pardoned by the president. In 1906, Dreyfus was exonerated by a civilian court of appeals, although the army did not declare his innocence until 1995.
The Dreyfus affair had a lasting impact on France, leading to a sharper alignment of political and social forces, and contributing to the separation of church and state in 1905.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Who was Alfred Dreyfus?
Alfred Dreyfus (1859â1935) was a French army officer whose treason trial triggered the Dreyfus affair, a 12-year controversy that deeply impacted the French Third Republic's political and social history.
Dreyfus, from a wealthy Jewish family, entered the Ăcole Polytechnique in 1882 and became a captain by 1889. In 1894, he was accused of selling military secrets to Germany, arrested, convicted, and sentenced to life imprisonment on Devil's Island.
Based on specious evidence, the legal proceedings were highly irregular. Despite Dreyfus's denials and his family's support, the antisemitic French press, led by Ădouard Drumont, welcomed the verdict, using Dreyfus to symbolize supposed Jewish disloyalty.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why was Dreyfus accused of a crime?
Alfred Dreyfus, a French army officer, was accused of selling military secrets to the German military attaché in 1894. The accusations against Dreyfus, who was Jewish, quickly became a political crisis known as the Dreyfus affair, which divided France. Much of the early publicity surrounding the case came from antisemitic groups who used Dreyfus to symbolize the supposed disloyalty of French Jews. Irregular legal proceedings convicted Dreyfus based on specious evidence, and he was sentenced to life imprisonment.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did the French public react to the Dreyfus affair?
Initially, the French public largely supported Alfred Dreyfus 's conviction for treason, influenced by anti-Semitic sentiments and the belief in his guilt. Newspapers like La Libre Parole amplified these sentiments, portraying Dreyfus as a symbol of Jewish disloyalty.
As evidence emerged pointing to another officer, Ferdinand Walsin-Esterhazy, as the true culprit, public opinion began to shift. Intellectuals and journalists, such as Ămile Zola, who wrote "JâAccuse," and Georges Clemenceau, rallied to Dreyfusâs defense, leading to a division of France into Dreyfusards, who sought exoneration, and anti-Dreyfusards, who viewed the controversy as an attack on the nation. This split deepened antagonisms between right and left, impacting French society and politics for years to come.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What role did anti-Semitism play in the Dreyfus affair?
Anti-Semitism played a significant role in the Dreyfus affair. Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish captain in the French army, was accused of selling military secrets to Germany. The press, led by an anti-Semitic faction, used Dreyfus as a symbol of supposed disloyalty of French Jews, which stirred public opinion against him. The anti-Dreyfusards viewed the case as a defense against international socialism and Jewry. Ădouard Drumont's newspaper, La Libre Parole, fueled anti-Semitism. The affair revealed a division in France and a repudiation of anti-Semitism.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did the Dreyfus affair change French society and politics?
The Dreyfus affair, a political crisis in France from 1894 to 1906, centered on the false accusation and conviction of army captain Alfred Dreyfus for treason. The case intensified antagonisms between the right and left, forcing individuals to choose sides and leaving a lasting impact on French national consciousness.
With the Dreyfusards in power, the affair marked a new phase in the Third Republic, where Radical-led governments pursued an anticlerical policy that led to the separation of church and state in 1905. The Dreyfusards wanted to republicanize the army and put it under parliamentary control. The affair also exposed deep-seated antisemitism within French society and the military, prompting a reevaluation of values and institutions.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Dreyfus affair, political crisis, beginning in 1894 and continuing through 1906, in France during the Third Republic. The controversy centred on the question of the guilt or innocence of army captain Alfred Dreyfus, who had been convicted of treason for allegedly selling military secrets to the Germans in December 1894. At first the public supported the conviction; it was willing to believe in the guilt of Dreyfus, who was Jewish. Much of the early publicity surrounding the case came from anti-Semitic groups (especially the newspaper La Libre Parole, edited by Ădouard Drumont), to whom Dreyfus symbolized the supposed disloyalty of French Jews.
The effort to reverse the sentence was at first limited to members of the Dreyfus family, but, as evidence pointing to the guilt of another French officer, Ferdinand Walsin-Esterhazy, came to light from 1896, the pro-Dreyfus side slowly gained adherents (among them journalists Joseph Reinach and Georges Clemenceauâthe future World War I premierâand a senator, Auguste Scheurer-Kestner). The accusations against Esterhazy resulted in a court-martial that acquitted him of treason (January 1898). To protest against the verdict, the novelist Ămile Zola wrote a letter titled âJâaccuse,â published in Clemenceauâs newspaper LâAurore. In it he attacked the army for covering up its mistaken conviction of Dreyfus, an action for which Zola was found guilty of libel.
By the time of the Zola letter, the Dreyfus case had attracted widespread public attention and had split France into two opposing camps. The anti-Dreyfusards (those against reopening the case) viewed the controversy as an attempt by the nationâs enemies to discredit the army and weaken France. The Dreyfusards (those seeking exoneration of Captain Dreyfus) saw the issue as the principle of the freedom of the individual subordinated to that of national security. They wanted to republicanize the army and put it under parliamentary control.
From 1898 to 1899 the Dreyfusard cause gained in strength. In August 1898 an important document implicating Dreyfus was found to be a forgery. After Maj. Hubert-Joseph Henry of the intelligence section confessed to fabricating the document in order to strengthen the armyâs position, revision was made almost certain. At the same time, the affair was becoming a question of vital concern to politicians. The republican parties in the Chamber of Deputies recognized that the increasingly vocal nationalist right posed a threat to the parliamentary regime. Led by the Radicals, a left-wing coalition was formed. In response to continuing disorders and demonstrations, a cabinet headed by the Radical RenĂ© Waldeck-Rousseau was set up in June 1899 with the express purpose of defending the republic and with the hope of settling the judicial side of the Dreyfus case as soon as possible. When a new court-martial, held at Rennes, found Dreyfus guilty in September 1899, the president of the republic, in order to resolve the issue, pardoned him. In July 1906 a civilian court of appeals (the Cour dâAppel) set aside the judgment of the Rennes court and rehabilitated Dreyfus. The army, however, did not publicly declare his innocence until 1995.
With the Dreyfusards in the ascendant, the affair marked the start of a new phase in the history of the Third Republic, a phase in which a series of Radical-led governments pursued an anticlerical policy that culminated in the formal separation of church and state (1905). By intensifying antagonisms between right and left and by forcing individuals to choose sides, the case made a lasting impact on the consciousness of the French nation.