- In full:
- Lucius Cornelius Sulla or
- Later:
- Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix
- Born:
- 138 bce
- Died:
- 79 bce, Puteoli [Pozzuoli, near Naples, Italy]
- Title / Office:
- Roman dictator (82BC-79BC), ancient Rome
- quaestor (107BC-103BC), ancient Rome
- Role In:
- Social War
-
Who was Sulla in ancient Rome?
Lucius Cornelius Sulla, born into an unimportant patrician family, began his political career in 107 BCE, serving under Gaius Marius. Sulla's capture of King Jugurtha initiated a feud with Marius, though they later served together against the Cimbri.
Sulla's career included service as a praetor in 97 BCE and as a commander in the Social War (90–89 BCE). Elected consul in 88 BCE, he was assigned command against Mithradates VI. Sulla marched on Rome after Marius, allied with tribune Publius Sulpicius Rufus, was appointed commander instead. After regaining power, Sulla left for the East to fight Mithradates.
While Sulla was away, the ruling popular party declared him a public enemy. After making peace with Mithradates, Sulla returned to Italy, where his army broke all resistance and occupied Rome in 82 BCE. Sulla was then elected dictator and implemented reforms aimed at stabilizing the authority of the Senate. In 79 BCE, Sulla resigned and retired as a private citizen.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What does it mean to be a dictator in Roman history?
In the Roman Republic, a dictator was a temporary magistrate with extraordinary powers, nominated by a consul and confirmed by a popular assembly, generally during military or internal crises. The dictator's term was set for six months, and they had authority over all other magistrates.
Sulla's dictatorship, conferred upon him under the Lex Valeria, differed significantly from this traditional role. It was an extra-constitutional office with virtually unlimited powers, meant to restore the republic, without a limited duration. Sulla utilized this power to enact extensive constitutional reforms aimed at re-establishing the supremacy of the Senate. These reforms included increasing the number of courts for criminal trials and laws designed to prevent insurrection. In 79 BCE, Sulla resigned from his dictatorship, a move that was seen as an act of honesty, and retired as a private citizen.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Sulla become the ruler of Rome?
Sulla, elected consul in 88 BCE, initially gained command against Mithradates VI. However, Marius, through political maneuvering, had the command transferred to himself. Sulla responded by marching on Rome with his army, an unprecedented act, and forced Marius into exile.
After defeating Mithradates, Sulla returned to Rome in 83 BCE. During his absence, he had been declared a public enemy. With the support of Marcus Crassus and Pompey, Sulla marched on Rome, and after a civil war, seized control. Appointed dictator under the Lex Valeria, Sulla initiated a period of massacres and proscriptions. Sulla implemented reforms aimed at restoring the Senate's authority by diminishing the power of tribunes and provincial governors.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What major changes did Sulla make to Rome's government?
As dictator of Rome, Sulla enacted extensive constitutional reforms aimed at re-establishing the Senate's supremacy and stabilizing the government. His reforms included increasing the number of courts for criminal trials and creating the Lex Cornelia Majestatis, a new treason law. Sulla also required tribunes to submit legislative proposals to the Senate for approval and enacted laws protecting citizens from judicial and executive excesses. Additionally, he increased the number of quaestors to 20, ensuring all former quaestors automatically entered the Senate.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why was Sulla's rule considered controversial or harsh?
Sulla's rule is viewed as controversial and harsh due to his unprecedented actions and policies as dictator of Rome. Sulla used proscription, publishing lists of political enemies who were then hunted and killed, their properties seized, and their families penalized. Thousands of citizens were killed without trial, enriching Sulla and his supporters. Land was confiscated in areas that resisted him and given to his soldiers. Although Sulla aimed to restore stability and empower the Senate, his methods were brutal and terrorizing.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Sulla's actions affect the later history of Rome?
Sulla's actions significantly impacted the later history of Rome. As dictator, he implemented constitutional reforms aimed at restoring the Senate's authority by limiting the power of tribunes and provincial governors. His proscriptions, the posted lists of Roman citizens declared outlaws, led to massacres and confiscations of property, creating a climate of terror and enriching Sulla and his supporters.
While Sulla intended to prevent future dictatorships, his own example paved the way for Julius Caesar. Sulla's reforms ultimately failed to address the underlying issues of the late Republic, and his use of a private army to seize power set a dangerous precedent that others, like Caesar, would follow.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Sulla (born 138 bce—died 79 bce, Puteoli [Pozzuoli, near Naples, Italy]) was the victor in the first full-scale civil war in Roman history (88–82 bce) and subsequently dictator (82–79), who carried out notable constitutional reforms in an attempt to strengthen the Roman Republic during the last century of its existence. In late 82 he assumed the name Felix in belief in his own luck.
Life
Sulla was the son of a politically unimportant patrician family. He early showed a taste for luxury and aspired to a political career, which he began in 107 bce, under the command of Gaius Marius, as a quaestor (financial magistrate) in Africa in the war against King Jugurtha of the Numidians. His spectacular capture of Jugurtha by trickery marked the start of his feud with Marius. Although Marius continued to use Sulla in the war against the invading Cimbri, in 103 bce his jealousy became obvious, and Sulla transferred to the service of Marius’ co-commander, Quintus Lutatius Catulus.
After service as a Roman praetor (one of the chief magistrates) in 97 bce, Sulla fought in the Social War (90–89 bce), the struggle of Rome’s Italian allies to obtain Roman citizenship. He became one of the two consuls—the highest office in the republic—in 88 and was placed in command of the war against King Mithradates VI of Pontus in Asia Minor. By his marriage—his fourth—to Caecilia Metella, the widow of Marcus Aemilius Scaurus, in 88 bce, he formed important alliances. The Senate gave Sulla the command of an army against Mithradates, who was threatening Roman control of the east, but Marius, through his alliance with the tribune Publius Sulpicius Rufus of the popular party, succeeded in being appointed commander instead. Sulla marched on Rome and Sulpicius was killed, but Marius escaped.
In 88 Sulla set off for Greece in charge of the war against Mithradates. By the spring of 87 most of Greece was in his power, and after a long siege he captured Athens in 86. Mithradates’ general, Archelaus, was pursued into Boeotia and finally defeated in two battles in 86.
At a meeting in 85 between Sulla and Mithradates at Dardanus on the Hellespont, the latter accepted a punitive treaty. Order was restored in Asia and Greece, and Mithradates became a vassal of the Romans again. In the summer of 83, Sulla, after a lengthy stay in Athens, returned to Brundisium in southern Italy with 40,000 men and enormous plunder.
During his absence Sulla had been declared a public enemy by the ruling popular party. His laws were repealed, his house was destroyed, and his family and friends fled to join him in Greece. In 86 the former consul Lucius Valerius Flaccus was sent to replace Sulla in the Asian command. But Sulla’s luck did not desert him; Flaccus was murdered by his lieutenant.
From Brundisium, Sulla began his march on Rome, joined by opponents of the popular regime, including Marcus Licinius Crassus and Pompey. Through most of the ensuing civil war Sulla was opposed by the consuls Gnaeus Papirius Carbo and the younger Marius (whose father had died in 86). Sulla’s victory of Colline Gate in the northern environs of Rome and the fall of Praeneste at the end of 82 ended the war, which was followed by massacres and proscriptions.
Sulla was appointed dictator under the Lex Valeria (Valerian law), which vested constituent, legislative, military, and judicial power in him, without, however, for the first time in Rome’s history, limiting the duration of his dictatorship.
The state was reorganized and the new legislation enacted in 81, at the start of which year (January 27–28) Sulla celebrated his victory over Mithradates. In the speech delivered at the close of the ceremony, he chose for himself the name of Felix (Epaphroditos in Greek documents).
By his extensive program of constitutional reform he intended mainly to reestablish the supremacy of the Senate in the Roman state, and his administrative reforms did indeed survive to the end of the republic. Of value were the increase of the number of courts for criminal trials; a new treason law, Lex Cornelia Majestatis, designed to prevent insurrection by provincial governors and army commanders; the requirement that the tribunes had to submit their legislative proposals to the Senate for approval; and various laws protecting citizens against excesses of judicial and executive organs.
At the beginning of 79, Sulla resigned and withdrew to the neighbourhood of Puteoli in Campania. This action caused a sensation in Rome; many different explanations have been given, starting with the classical writers. Most commonly accepted is the view that Sulla’s resignation was an act of honesty by a man who had pledged to step down as soon as his reforms had been carried out. Henceforth a private citizen, he continued to write his memoirs. Active to his very last days, Sulla was struck down by a fever in the spring of 78. He left behind two children by Metella and a posthumous daughter by his fifth wife, Valeria.
Legacy
Sulla, a soldier and a politician, a dictator and a reformer, and a man of contradictions in an age of contradictions, is the subject of contradictory opinions expressed by both classical and modern writers. The classical writers of Sulla’s time or shortly thereafter found it difficult to form an opinion of him; they noted the discrepancy of the Sulla “who follows up good beginnings with evil deeds.” Generally their attitude was a negative one, with references to despotism, slavery, cruelty, and inhumanity, and the absence of any principle of good government. The opinions held by modern writers cover a spectrum ranging from Sulla the enigma (because of his resignation), to Sulla the monarch, to Sulla the honest reformer.
Sulla was the exponent of a decadent patriciate that tried everything in its power to save itself by instituting reforms that, while not without democratic aspects, lacked inner vitality. From the long-term perspective Sulla’s actions seem meaningless; but viewed in their historical context they are justified by the transitional character—both in its military and political aspect—of his age. Inspired by a glorious past, interpreting an extremely volatile present, and heralding a future faithful to tradition, Sulla played a historical role, conclusively shaping and epitomizing the republican ideal shortly before it became submerged. But he was mistaken about the significance of his reforms: he was a temporary dictator because he wanted no one else who might follow him to become a dictator for life; yet by his example he unwittingly paved the way for Julius Caesar.