- Born:
- c. 1208, Montfort, Ile-de-France, France
- Died:
- Aug. 4, 1265, Evesham, Worcestershire, Eng.
- Title / Office:
- dictator (1264-1265), England
- House / Dynasty:
- Montfort family
- Notable Family Members:
- father Simon de Montfort
Simon de Montfort, earl of Leicester
-
Who was Simon de Montfort?
Simon de Montfort, born around 1208 in Montfort, France, led the baronial revolt against King Henry III and briefly governed England. In 1229, he pursued his family's claim to the earldom of Leicester, which King Henry III formally granted in 1239.
Simon's discontent with Henry's rule grew, fueled by the king's ineffective governance and Simon's vision of a reformed church and state. He joined other barons in enacting the Provisions of Oxford in 1258, which aimed to curb royal power.
After Henry rejected these reforms, Simon led a rebellion, capturing the king at the Battle of Lewes in 1264. He then governed England, advocating for a limited monarchy and inclusive parliaments. However, his rule ended with his death at the Battle of Evesham in 1265.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Where was Simon de Montfort originally from?
Simon de Montfort, Earl of Leicester, was born around 1208 in Montfort, Ile-de-France, France. He was of French birth and education and was the son of Simon de Montfort lâAmaury, who led the Crusade against the Albigenses. The Montfort family was associated with a lordship in the Ile-de-France, Montfort-lâAmaury.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What title did Simon de Montfort hold in England?
Simon de Montfort was the earl of Leicester. King John recognized Simonâs father as earl around 1205 but deprived him of the title in 1207 because he was a French subject. In 1229, Simon came to England and obtained the honor of Leicester. Although he did homage to Henry III in 1231, he was not formally styled earl of Leicester until April 1239.
De Montfort led the baronial revolt against King Henry III and controlled England for a little less than a year.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What role did Simon de Montfort play in English government?
Simon de Montfort, earl of Leicester, played a significant role in English government during the reign of Henry III. He led baronial opposition to Henry's policies, which ultimately led to the Barons' War.
De Montfort championed the Provisions of Oxford, a reform plan designed to curb royal power and address baronial grievances. Although the Provisions were later annulled, de Montfort continued to advocate for reform, leading a rebellion and capturing King Henry III at the Battle of Lewes in 1264.
As ruler of England, de Montfort summoned representatives from boroughs to Parliament in 1265, seeking broader support for his government. Though his rule was short-lived, de Montfort is remembered as an early proponent of limited monarchy and parliamentary reform.
5 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Simon de Montfort challenge King Henry III?
Simon de Montfort challenged King Henry III through political reform and, ultimately, armed conflict. Montfort, convinced Henry III was unfit to rule, joined other barons in enacting the Provisions of Oxford in 1258, which sought to reform the kingdom and limit royal power.
When Henry rejected these reforms, Montfort led a baronial revolt, capturing the king at the Battle of Lewes in 1264 and effectively ruling England for a time. Seeking broader support, Montfort summoned representatives from shires and boroughs to Parliament in 1265. However, he was defeated and killed at the Battle of Evesham.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why is Simon de Montfort remembered as an important figure in English history?
Simon de Montfort, Earl of Leicester, is remembered as a key figure due to his role in advocating for a limited monarchy and pioneering parliamentary reforms in England. Born in France, Montfort led the baronial revolt against King Henry III, challenging the king's inept policies.
As a leader, Montfort largely controlled England for a brief period, initiating important administrative and parliamentary experiments. Simon is noted for calling representatives of shires and boroughs to Parliament in 1265, seeking broader support for his reforms. Although his rule was cut short by his death at the Battle of Evesham, Montfort's efforts laid groundwork for future parliamentary developments and a more representative government.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Simon de Montfort, earl of Leicester (born c. 1208, Montfort, Ile-de-France, Franceâdied Aug. 4, 1265, Evesham, Worcestershire, Eng.) was the leader of the baronial revolt against King Henry III and ruler of England for less than a year.
Simon de Montfort, wholly French by birth and education, was the son of Simon de Montfort lâAmaury, leader of the Crusade against the heretical Albigenses. On coming of age, he renounced to his eldest brother, Amaury, his claims on the family lands in return for the sole right to revive the Montfort claim to the English earldom of Leicester. This claim derived from his fatherâs mother, Amicia, sister of Robert IV (died 1204), the last Beaumont earl of Leicester, whose lands had been divided between Amicia and her younger sister Margaret, countess of Winchester. King John had recognized Simonâs father as earl (c. 1205) but had deprived him as a French subject (1207), and the Montfort claim had then lapsed.
Simon came to England in 1229 and, helped by his cousin Ranulf, earl of Chester, the tenant of the confiscated estates, obtained the honour of Leicester and did homage to Henry III in 1231, though he was not formally styled earl of Leicester until April 1239. He speedily became one of Henryâs favourites, receiving an annual fee of 500 marks to compensate for the divided inheritance and exercising the hereditary stewardship at the coronation of Queen Eleanor (Eleanor of Provence; 1236). Henry arranged for his sister Eleanor to marry Simon on Jan. 7, 1238, thus breaking Eleanorâs earlier vow of chastity and offending the English noblemen, who were not consulted. Henryâs brother, Richard, earl of Cornwall, led an angry baronial protest, and Henry, alarmed, turned against Simon and Eleanor, driving them from England (August 1239). Simon went on Crusade (1240â42) with Richard, with whom he was now reconciled, and won great prestige among the lords of the Latin kingdom of Jerusalem, who asked their absentee king, the emperor Frederick II, to appoint Simon as his viceroy there. Returning to England, Simon joined Henryâs disastrous invasion of France (1242), winning distinction by covering Henryâs escape after his defeat at Saintes. Reconciled with Henry, and accepting an unfavourable settlement of Countess Eleanorâs dower claims, Simon now made Kenilworth Castle (a royal grant) his headquarters. He cultivated the friendship of the radical reformer Robert Grosseteste, bishop of Lincoln, and took Robertâs friend, the Oxford Franciscan Adam de Marisco, as spiritual director. Although regarded as a kingâs man, Simon was one of the committee of 12 appointed to handle the acute crisis of 1244 between Henry and his angry barons. He also took part in many important embassies to the French, papal, and imperial courts, and as a result he won many influential friends.
In 1248 Henry asked Simon to pacify the English-held duchy of Gascony, in southwestern France. Simon, eager to join Louis IXâs Crusade, accepted reluctantly, stipulating for full powers as regent for seven years, without fear of recall and with full refund of expenses incurred. Treating the Gascon nobles as faithless rebels outside the law, he ruthlessly crushed the revolt and restored order; the Gascons appealed to Henry, accusing Simon of illegal procedure and oppression and threatening to renew their revolt. The matter was complicated by Simonâs personal contest with Gaston de BĂ©arn, the leading rebel. Henry, frightened, recalled Simon for trial on the rebelsâ charges; the English magnates acquitted him (1252), and he returned to Gascony to suppress the renewed revolt, but Henry now terminated his lieutenancy. Simon, accepting a partial financial settlement, withdrew to France, though Henry had to implore his help in his own campaign against the rebels in 1253. Such was Simonâs international reputation that when Louis IXâs mother, Blanche of Castile, died (November 1252) while Louis was still on Crusade, the French magnates invited Simon to succeed her as regent.
Henryâs behaviour over Gascony, though not wholly unjustified, convinced Simon that Henry was unfit to rule, and the kingâs disastrous undertaking, at Pope Innocent IVâs behest, to conquer Sicily for his son Edmund strengthened this conviction. Discussions with Grosseteste, Marisco, and other Franciscan intellectuals had fired Simonâs mind with visions of a new order in both church and state, and he joined the other leading English barons in forcing upon Henry the revolutionary Provisions of Oxford (June 1258). The reformers began well, but by October 1259 divisions appeared between the conservative wing, led by Richard de Clare, earl of Gloucester, that sought only to limit abuses of royal power, and the radical element, led by Simon, that sought to bind the entire baronage to observe the reforms forced upon the king and his officers. Simon exacerbated the quarrel by his arrogant vehemence and put himself in the wrong by attempting to use Henryâs subordination to secure settlement of his own and his wifeâs justifiable personal claims on Henry. Henry, allying with the Gloucester faction, shattered baronial unity early in 1260, and Simon emerged leading the extremist defenders of the reforms. By October 1261 Henry had isolated Simon, who went abroad; but the kingâs annulment of the Provisions, after he had received papal absolution from his oath to observe them, revived general disaffection (1262), and Simon returned (April 1263) to lead a rebellion that restored the Provisions (July 1263). But baronial unity had vanished, and, despite passionate support from the lesser barons, the county knights, the men of London and the Cinque Ports, and many clergy, Simon was forced to accept arbitration by Louis IX (December 1263). By the Mise of Amiens (January 1264) Louis totally annulled the Provisions and all consequent reforms: Simon rejected the award and after unsuccessfully attempting direct negotiations, defeated Henry at Lewes (May 14, 1264), capturing Henry and his son, the lord Edward.
Simon then governed England by military dictatorship, striving unsuccessfully for a legal basis of consent, both by negotiations with Henryâs supporters and by calling representatives of both shires and boroughs to Parliament (1265) to counterbalance his lack of baronial support. But his monopolization of power alienated his chief ally, the young Gilbert de Clare, earl of Gloucester, who joined the royalist Marcher lords and secured Lord Edwardâs escape at Hereford (May 1265). By rapid and skillful maneuvering, Edward isolated Simon behind the Severn, destroyed at Kenilworth (August 1) the large army coming to his rescue, and trapped Simonâs little force at Evesham (Aug. 4, 1265), slaying Simon and most of his followers.
The most outstanding English personality of his day, Simon is remembered as an early advocate of a limited monarchy, ruling through elected councillors and responsible officials, and of parliaments including county knights and burgesses as well as the great nobles.

