- In full:
- Rudolf Karl Bultmann
- Born:
- August 20, 1884, Wiefelstede, Germany
- Died:
- July 30, 1976, Marburg, West Germany [now in Germany] (aged 91)
- Subjects Of Study:
- theological existentialism
Rudolf Bultmann
-
Who was Rudolf Bultmann?
Rudolf Bultmann (1884–1976) was a prominent German theologian and a leading New Testament scholar in the 20th century. Heavily influenced by the philosophies of Wilhelm Dilthey and Martin Heidegger, Bultmann championed an existential interpretation of the New Testament.
Bultmann is best known for his proposal to "demythologize" the New Testament, interpreting its essential message, expressed in mythical terms, through the lens of existentialist philosophy. During the Hitler years, Bultmann supported the Confessing Church and refused to alter his teachings to align with Nazi ideology. His work has been the subject of extensive discussion, and his views have served as a point of departure for significant theological developments internationally.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What was Rudolf Bultmann known for in theology?
Rudolf Bultmann was a prominent 20th-century New Testament scholar known for his efforts to "demythologize" the New Testament, interpreting its essential message through the lens of existentialist philosophy.
Bultmann's theology, developed during discussions with Martin Heidegger, centered on the idea that Christian faith should focus on the transcendent Christ rather than the historical Jesus. He asserted that faith is rooted in the kerygma (proclamation) of the church, into which Jesus is risen, rather than in the historical figure of Jesus.
His work significantly influenced New Testament scholarship and theology, becoming a focal point for discussions and developments in both Germany and the United States. Bultmann's demythologizing program sparked considerable debate and was the subject of the multi-volume series Kerygma und Mythos.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What does it mean to 'demythologize' the Bible, according to Bultmann?
According to Rudolf Bultmann, to "demythologize" the Bible means to interpret the essential message of the New Testament, which was expressed in mythical terms, according to the concepts of existentialist philosophy. Bultmann believed that people in modern times could no longer think in the mythological terms used in the New Testament.
Bultmann identified mythological elements such as belief in the pre-existence of Christ, the three-layer universe, miracles, ascension into heaven, and demonology. He claimed that the inner meaning of the myths had to be explained in existential terms and purged of the objectifications that they contain.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Bultmann’s ideas differ from traditional Christian beliefs?
Rudolf Bultmann, a prominent 20th-century New Testament scholar, aimed to "demythologize" the New Testament, interpreting its essential message through existentialist philosophy.
Bultmann's theological position asserted that Christian faith should be comparatively uninterested in the historical Jesus, centering instead on the transcendent Christ. He emphasized faith in the kerygma (proclamation) of the church, into which Jesus is risen, rather than faith in the historical Jesus. Bultmann argued that people could no longer think in the mythological terms used in the New Testament and that these myths needed to be interpreted in existential terms.
His approach differed from traditional Christian beliefs that typically emphasize the importance of the historical Jesus and may not align with existentialist interpretations.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why did Bultmann believe that faith was more important than historical facts in Christianity?
Rudolf Bultmann, influenced by Martin Heidegger's existentialism, believed Christian faith should center on the transcendent Christ rather than the historical Jesus. He asserted that faith is in the kerygma (proclamation) of the church, into which Jesus is risen, not in the historical figure.
Bultmann aimed to "demythologize" the New Testament, interpreting its essential message through existentialist philosophy. He felt that modern people could no longer think in the mythological terms of the New Testament. This approach sought to restate the gospel in a way that addresses shifts in philosophical conceptions of knowledge, without infringing on the knowledge brought by the natural sciences.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Rudolf Bultmann influence the study and understanding of the New Testament in modern times?
Rudolf Bultmann, a prominent New Testament scholar, significantly shaped modern understanding through his "demythologizing" program, interpreting the New Testament's essential message using existentialist philosophy. Bultmann's seminal work, History of the Synoptic Tradition, analyzed the traditional material used by the Evangelists.
His theological position, influenced by Martin Heidegger, centered on faith in the kerygma (proclamation) of the church rather than the historical Jesus. Bultmann's approach involved distinguishing the early church's thinking from modern thought, deeming it necessary to demythologize the New Testament message by interpreting its inner meaning in existential terms. His work became a focal point for theologians and New Testament scholars, influencing theological developments internationally.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Rudolf Bultmann (born August 20, 1884, Wiefelstede, Germany—died July 30, 1976, Marburg, West Germany [now in Germany]) was a leading 20th-century New Testament scholar known for his program to “demythologize” the New Testament—i.e., to interpret, according to the concepts of existentialist philosophy, the essential message of the New Testament that was expressed in mythical terms.
Early career
Bultmann, the son of a Lutheran pastor and the grandson of a missionary, always intended to follow an academic theological career, and at 19 he began his theological studies at the University of Tübingen. By 1912 he had completed his qualifying studies and was appointed a lecturer at the University of Marburg. There followed appointments at Breslau (1916) and Giessen (1920). In 1921 he was appointed professor of New Testament at Marburg, where he remained until his retirement in 1951.
In 1921 Bultmann published his Geschichte der synoptischen Tradition (History of the Synoptic Tradition), an analysis of the traditional material used by the Evangelists Matthew, Mark, and Luke and an attempt to trace its history in the tradition of the church prior to their use of it. This proved to be a seminal work, and it established Bultmann’s reputation as a scholar. He followed it with a book on Jesus (Jesus, 1926; Jesus and the Word, 1934), in which the beginning of his own theological position can be traced. Between 1922 and 1928 he had as a colleague at Marburg the German existentialist philosopher Martin Heidegger, whose Sein und Zeit (Being and Time) was published in 1927. Heidegger was enormously influential upon Bultmann, in part because Bultmann felt that he was developing, in philosophical terms, an analysis of human existence that was strikingly parallel to the understanding of human existence implied by the theologies of St. Paul and St. John, as Bultmann interpreted them.
Bultmann’s theology
It was during these years of discussion with Heidegger that Bultmann developed his own theological position—namely, that Christian faith is, and should be, comparatively uninterested in the historical Jesus and centred instead on the transcendent Christ. Christian faith, he asserted, is faith in the kērygma (“proclamation”) of the church, into which Jesus may be said to be risen (Bultmann’s understanding of the Resurrection), and not faith in the historical Jesus. This view found its earliest expression in two essays, “Der Begriff der Offenbarung im Neuen Testament” (“The Concept of Revelation in the New Testament”), written in 1929, and “Die Geschichtlichkeit des Daseins und der Glaube” (“The Historicity of Man and Faith”), written in 1930. Bultmann’s position was to remain constant thereafter, and all his subsequent work, including his demythologizing proposal made in 1941, developed consistently out of it.
During the Hitler years in Germany, Bultmann refused to modify his teaching in any way to suit Nazi ideology, and he supported the Confessing Church, the German Protestant movement organized to resist Nazi church policy. But, in his own words, he “never directly and actively participated in political affairs”; i.e., he did not directly oppose the Nazi regime.
With the resumption of contacts between the German universities and the rest of the world after World War II, Bultmann became a major international academic figure. His pupils came to occupy leading positions in German universities, and his views were the subject of discussion around the world. All New Testament scholars found themselves in dialogue with him, and among theologians his position became the point of departure for major developments in both Germany and the United States. He himself gave an extremely influential series of lectures in Britain in 1955 (History and Eschatology: The Presence of Eternity) and in the United States in 1958 (Jesus Christ and Mythology), and his demythologizing program became the subject of a multivolume series with the title Kerygma und Mythos (Kerygma and Myth).
Legacy
Bultmann was an outstanding teacher, and he encouraged independence of mind among his students. The result was two major developments within the “Bultmann school.” In 1954 Ernst Käsemann raised “the question of the historical Jesus” (i.e., the question of the significance of knowledge of the historical Jesus for Christian faith), and a number of Bultmann’s pupils developed a position independent of their teacher’s on the matter. Then Ernst Fuchs and Gerhard Ebeling, building on Bultmann’s existentialist analysis, developed a method of interpreting the New Testament that emphasized the linguistic mode of human existence. This is the so-called new hermeneutic. Bultmann himself took part in these discussions along with his pupils for as long as his health permitted, later living quietly in Marburg.