Roger de Piles
Quick Summary
Roger de Piles was a French art critic who played a significant role in the debate between the "Poussinists" and "Rubenists" in the French Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture during the late 17th century. He championed the "Rubenists," who emphasized the importance of color over design and drawing in painting.12
De Piles argued that genius could transcend established rules and that a critic's subjective feelings, alongside reason, were valid in evaluating art. His writings helped legitimize the "Rubenist" perspective, challenging the dominance of the more rigid "Poussinist" approach and contributing to a shift in art criticism towards a greater appreciation of individual expression and color.12
Ask Britannica AI about this topic
Britannica doesn't have a full article on this topic, so we've curated a list of our relevant coverage.
Nicolas PoussinLegacy…into a theoretical dispute with Roger de Piles; their respective sides were known as Poussinists and Rubenists, the former upholding the importance of line over colour and the latter the reverse. The Rubenists eventually triumphed, and the result was the art of Antoine Watteau and the Rococo.
Read More…into a theoretical dispute with Roger de Piles; their respective sides were known as Poussinists and Rubenists, the former upholding the importance of line over colour and the latter the reverse. The Rubenists eventually triumphed, and the result was the art of Antoine Watteau and the Rococo.
Read More- Rubenist
…the colourist party, the critic Roger de Piles published a series of theoretical pamphlets setting forth the arguments and counterarguments. In 1673 his Dialogue sur le coloris (“Dialogue on Colour”) appeared, and in 1677 he followed it with Conversations sur la peinture (“Conversations on Painting”). The victory for the colourists…
Read More…the colourist party, the critic Roger de Piles published a series of theoretical pamphlets setting forth the arguments and counterarguments. In 1673 his Dialogue sur le coloris (“Dialogue on Colour”) appeared, and in 1677 he followed it with Conversations sur la peinture (“Conversations on Painting”). The victory for the colourists…
Read More 
art criticismArt criticism in the 17th century: Programmatic theory…to a head when critic Roger de Piles published a series of theoretical pamphlets setting forth an argument for the Rubenists in 1676. De Piles’s writings helped break the hold of the Poussinists in the French Academy by legitimating an alternative to it, giving the Rubenists credibility—especially when he was…
Read More…to a head when critic Roger de Piles published a series of theoretical pamphlets setting forth an argument for the Rubenists in 1676. De Piles’s writings helped break the hold of the Poussinists in the French Academy by legitimating an alternative to it, giving the Rubenists credibility—especially when he was…
Read More