- In full:
- Robert Alan Dahl
- Died:
- February 5, 2014, Hamden, Connecticut (aged 98)
Robert A. Dahl
-
Who was Robert A. Dahl?
Robert A. Dahl (1915–2014) was a prominent American political scientist and educator, known as a leading theorist of political pluralism. He earned a Ph.D. from Yale and served in the U.S. Army during World War II, receiving the Bronze Star. Dahl taught at Yale until 1986 and later became Sterling Professor Emeritus of Political Science and Senior Research Scientist Sociology. His concept of polyarchy characterizes open, inclusive, and competitive political systems, distinguishing them from ideal democracy. Dahl served as president of the American Political Science Association (1966–67) and was a member of numerous research organizations and learned societies.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What field did Robert A. Dahl specialize in?
Robert A. Dahl was an American political scientist and educator who specialized in political science. He was a leading theorist of political pluralism, stressing the roles associations, groups, and organizations play in politics.
Dahl made his first major contribution to the field of political science in his 1957 work, "The Concept of Power," where he developed a formal definition of power. In his best-known work, Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City (1961), Dahl argued that political power in the United States is pluralistic.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is Robert A. Dahl known for studying in government or politics?
Robert A. Dahl was a prominent American political scientist and educator known for his work on political pluralism, which emphasizes the role of associations, groups, and organizations in politics. His study of power dynamics in New Haven, Connecticut, Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City (1961), argued that political power in the United States is dispersed among competing groups rather than monopolized by a single elite. Dahl also introduced the term polyarchy to describe political systems with open, inclusive, and competitive characteristics, distinguishing them from ideal democracies.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is the concept of 'polyarchy' that Robert A. Dahl introduced?
Robert A. Dahl coined the term polyarchy to describe how democratic institutions lead to participation from a variety of actors within a political system, contrasting this process of democratization with democracy itself. Dahl used the concept to empirically define democratization and create standards for determining if a political system can be considered a democracy. Polyarchy is characterized by institutions and societal groups operating autonomously and independently of the state.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Robert A. Dahl describe democracy in his work?
Robert A. Dahl described democracy through the concept of polyarchy, which emphasizes the presence of democratic institutions within a political system involving multiple participants. Polyarchy, or "rule by many," represents democratization, distinguishing it from the ideal of democracy itself.
Dahl saw polyarchy as a process toward achieving an ideal democracy, highlighting the importance of public power controlled by societal organizations and civil associations. He also stressed the necessity of institutions, societal groups, and the autonomy of these groups from the state. These include universal suffrage and free elections, rights to free speech, access to diverse information, the ability to form autonomous organizations, and governmental responsiveness and accountability.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why are Robert A. Dahl’s ideas important in the study of political science today?
Robert A. Dahl's ideas remain crucial in political science due to his theories on power, pluralism, and polyarchy. Dahl's concept of polyarchy describes democratization through the establishment of institutions, such as free elections and civil rights, that allow multiple actors to participate in the political system. His work Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City (1961) argued that power in the U.S. is dispersed among competing groups rather than monopolized by a single elite, challenging elite-power theories. His exploration of these concepts provides a framework for analyzing and enhancing democracy in extant political systems.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Robert A. Dahl (born December 17, 1915, Inwood, Iowa, U.S.—died February 5, 2014, Hamden, Connecticut) American political scientist and educator. A leading theorist of political pluralism, Dahl stressed the role in politics played by associations, groups, and organizations.
(Read Dahl’s contribution to Britannica’s entry on democracy.)
Dahl was a graduate of the University of Washington (A.B., 1936) and obtained a Ph.D. from Yale University in 1940. He served in the U.S. Army during World War II and was awarded the Bronze Star (with cluster) for distinguished service. After the war, Dahl returned to Yale, where he taught until 1986. He subsequently became Sterling Professor Emeritus of Political Science and Senior Research Scientist Sociology.
In “The Concept of Power” (1957), his first major contribution to the field of political science, Dahl developed a formal definition of power that was frequently cited as an important (though incomplete) insight into the phenomenon. According to Dahl, “A has power over B to the extent that he can get B to do something that B would not otherwise do.” Dahl gave as an example a professor threatening a student with a failing grade if he did not read a certain book during the holidays. In this case, the amount of power held by the professor can be conceived as the difference between the probability that the student would read the book before receiving the threat and the probability that he would read it after receiving the threat. Dahl argued that his definition could be used to compare the power of political actors in a given sphere—for instance, the influence of different U.S. senators on questions of foreign policy. Critics, such as the social theorist Steven Lukes, argued that Dahl’s definition failed to capture other important dimensions of power, such as the capacity of an actor to shape the norms and values held by others.
In his best-known work, Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City (1961), a study of power dynamics in New Haven, Connecticut, Dahl argued that political power in the United States is pluralistic. He thus rebutted power-elite theorists such as C. Wright Mills and Floyd Hunter, who had described the United States as a country ruled by a small group of interconnected individuals occupying key positions of power. In his study, Dahl found that while power was distributed unequally in New Haven, it was also dispersed among a number of groups in competition with each other, rather than monopolized by a single elite group.
Dahl introduced the term polyarchy to characterize American politics and other political systems that are open, inclusive, and competitive (Polyarchy, 1971). The concept allowed him to make a distinction between an ideal system of democracy and institutional arrangements that approximate this ideal. Thus, polyarchies are based on the principle of representative rather than direct democracy and therefore constitute a form of minority rule, yet they are also (imperfectly) democratized systems that limit the power of elite groups through institutions such as regular and free elections.
Despite his critique of elite-power theory, Dahl was faulted after the publication of Who Governs? for underestimating the importance of broad-based civic participation. Indeed, in Who Governs? Dahl had argued that democracy does not require mass participation and in fact rests on the consent of a relatively apathetic population. Later, in Democracy and Its Critics (1989), he recognized the value of an active citizenry and associated polyarchy with political rights such as freedom of expression and association.
The trusted destination for professionals, college students, and lifelong learners.
SUBSCRIBE
Dahl was the author of scores of important papers and several books. The latter include, in addition to those mentioned above, A Preface to Democratic Theory (1956); After the Revolution?: Authority in a Good Society (1970); Size and Democracy (1973), coauthored with Edward R. Tufte; A Preface to Economic Democracy (1985); On Democracy (1998); and How Democratic Is the American Constitution? (2001). Dahl is also the coauthor of Encyclopædia Britannica’s article on democracy.
He served as president of the American Political Science Association (1966–67) and was a member of numerous research organizations and learned societies, including the National Academy of Sciences, the American Philosophical Society, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the British Academy.