- In full:
- Richard McKay Rorty
- Born:
- Oct. 4, 1931, New York, N.Y., U.S.
- Died:
- June 8, 2007, Palo Alto, Calif. (aged 75)
Richard Rorty
-
Who was Richard Rorty?
Richard Rorty (1931–2007) was an American pragmatist philosopher and public intellectual known for his critique of philosophy as a quasi-scientific enterprise focused on certainty and objective truth.
Rorty was against the pursuit of absolute truth, and he saw philosophy's role as fostering intellectual conversation across fields like science, literature, politics, and religion to achieve understanding and resolve conflicts.
He opposed foundationalism in epistemology, representationism in the philosophy of language, and both realism and antirealism in metaphysics. Rorty's political works defended left-liberalism while critiquing cultural leftism and conservative positions. He taught at Wellesley College, Princeton University, the University of Virginia, and Stanford University.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is Richard Rorty known for in philosophy?
Richard Rorty (1931–2007) was an American pragmatist philosopher known for his critique of modern philosophy as a quasi-scientific pursuit of certainty and objective truth.
Rorty opposed foundationalism in epistemology, which posits that all knowledge is grounded in basic, self-justifying statements. He also rejected the notion of sentences or beliefs being "true" or "false" beyond their utility within social practices. Rorty opposed representationism, which views language's primary role as representing objective reality. In metaphysics, he dismissed both realism and antirealism as flawed due to representationalist assumptions about language.
Instead of seeking certainty, Rorty saw philosophy's role as fostering intellectual "conversation" among diverse fields like science, literature, and politics to promote understanding and resolve conflicts.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some major ideas Richard Rorty supported?
Richard Rorty was an American philosopher known for his critique of philosophy as a science seeking certainty and objective truth. He opposed foundationalism in epistemology, which posits that knowledge is grounded in basic, self-justifying statements. Rorty argued that no statement is more basic than another and is only justified contextually.
In the philosophy of language, he rejected the notion of sentences being "true" or "false" beyond their utility in social practice. He also opposed representationism, which views language as representing objective reality. In metaphysics, Rorty dismissed realism and antirealism as flawed assumptions about language. He believed philosophy should foster intellectual conversation across disciplines to achieve understanding and resolve conflicts and defended left-liberalism while critiquing cultural leftism and conservatism.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is Richard Rorty's view on truth and knowledge?
Richard Rorty critiqued philosophy's aim for certainty and objective truth. He opposed foundationalism, stating no statement is more epistemologically basic than another and is only justified relative to context.
Rejecting the notion of sentences or beliefs being "true" or "false" beyond their utility in social practice, Rorty also opposed representationism, which posits language's main function is to depict an objectively existing reality.
Rorty didn't advocate philosophy's pursuit of certainty or absolute truth. Instead, he believed philosophy should foster intellectual conversation between different forms of inquiry to achieve understanding and resolve conflicts. Though he refuted relativism and subjectivism, some critics argue his views lead to these conclusions.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Richard Rorty challenge traditional philosophy?
Richard Rorty challenged traditional philosophy by critiquing its conception as a quasi-scientific pursuit of certainty and objective truth. He opposed foundationalism, the idea that knowledge is grounded in basic, self-justifying statements.
Rorty rejected the notion of sentences or beliefs being "true" or "false" beyond their utility in social practice. He also opposed representationism, which views language as representing objective reality, and dismissed realism and antirealism as flawed assumptions about language. Instead of seeking certainty, Rorty saw philosophy's role as fostering intellectual "conversation" across disciplines to achieve understanding and resolve conflicts. He aimed to reconcile Continental and analytic philosophy, emphasizing the attacks on modern epistemology by John Dewey, Martin Heidegger, and Ludwig Wittgenstein.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How has Richard Rorty influenced modern thinking and politics?
Richard Rorty, an American pragmatist philosopher, critiqued modern philosophy's pursuit of certainty and objective truth. Instead, he advocated for intellectual conversation across disciplines to foster understanding and resolve conflicts. In politics, Rorty opposed both left and right-wing programs, favoring a reformist "bourgeois liberalism".
Rejecting foundationalism and representationism, Rorty argued that truth is determined by social usefulness rather than objective reality. While he resisted labels of relativism and subjectivism, some critics argued his views led to these conclusions. His work, including Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, has significantly influenced contemporary thought by challenging traditional philosophical concepts.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Richard Rorty (born Oct. 4, 1931, New York, N.Y., U.S.—died June 8, 2007, Palo Alto, Calif.) was an American pragmatist philosopher and public intellectual noted for his wide-ranging critique of the modern conception of philosophy as a quasi-scientific enterprise aimed at reaching certainty and objective truth. In politics, he argued against programs of both the left and the right in favour of what he described as a meliorative and reformist “bourgeois liberalism.”
The son of nonacademic leftist intellectuals who broke with the American Communist Party in the early 1930s, Rorty attended the University of Chicago and Yale University, where he obtained a Ph.D. in 1956. Following two years in the army, he taught philosophy at Wellesley College (1958–61) and Princeton University (1961–82) before accepting a position in the department of humanities at the University of Virginia. From 1998 until his retirement in 2005, Rorty taught comparative literature at Stanford University.
Rorty’s views are somewhat easier to characterize in negative than in positive terms. In epistemology he opposed foundationalism, the view that all knowledge can be grounded, or justified, in a set of basic statements that do not themselves require justification. According to his “epistemological behaviourism,” Rorty held that no statement is epistemologically more basic than any other, and no statement is ever justified “finally” but only relative to some circumscribed and contextually determined set of additional statements. In the philosophy of language, Rorty rejected the idea that sentences or beliefs are “true” or “false” in any interesting sense other than being useful or successful within a broad social practice. He also opposed representationism, the view that the main function of language is to represent or picture pieces of an objectively existing reality. Finally, in metaphysics he rejected both realism and antirealism, or idealism, as products of mistaken representationalist assumptions about language.
Because Rorty did not believe in certainty or absolute truth, he did not advocate the philosophical pursuit of such things. Instead, he believed that the role of philosophy is to conduct an intellectual “conversation” between contrasting but equally valid forms of intellectual inquiry—including science, literature, politics, religion, and many others—with the aim of achieving mutual understanding and resolving conflicts. This general view is reflected in Rorty’s political works, which consistently defend traditional left-liberalism and criticize newer forms of “cultural leftism” as well as more conservative positions.
Rorty defended himself against charges of relativism and subjectivism by claiming that he rejected the crucial distinctions these doctrines presuppose. Nevertheless, some critics have contended that his views lead ultimately to relativist or subjectivist conclusions, whether or not Rorty wished to characterize them in those terms. Others have challenged Rorty’s interpretation of earlier American pragmatist philosophers and suggested that Rorty’s own philosophy is not a genuine form of pragmatism.
Rorty’s publications include Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (1979), Consequences of Pragmatism (1982), and Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (1989).