Norman Malcolm
Quick Summary
Norman Malcolm was an American philosopher known for his work in analytic philosophy, particularly in the areas of philosophy of mind and language. He was a student of Ludwig Wittgenstein and was influenced by his ideas, especially regarding the nature of mental concepts and the problem of other minds. Malcolm argued against the traditional argument from analogy for belief in other minds, suggesting that understanding the criteria for attributing thoughts and feelings makes the argument unnecessary. His work often involved analyzing everyday language to clarify philosophical problems, focusing on concepts like knowledge, certainty, and memory. Malcolm's approach contributed to the development of philosophical psychology within the analytic tradition.12
Ask Britannica AI about this topic
Britannica doesn't have a full article on this topic, so we've curated a list of our relevant coverage.
ChristianityThe ontological argumentā¦Christian philosophers (notably Charles Hartshorne, Norman Malcolm, and Alvin Plantinga) asserted the validity of a second form of Anselmās argument. This hinges upon ānecessary existence,ā a property with even higher value than āexistence.ā A being that necessarily exists cannot coherently be thought not to exist. And so God, as theā¦
Read Moreā¦Christian philosophers (notably Charles Hartshorne, Norman Malcolm, and Alvin Plantinga) asserted the validity of a second form of Anselmās argument. This hinges upon ānecessary existence,ā a property with even higher value than āexistence.ā A being that necessarily exists cannot coherently be thought not to exist. And so God, as theā¦
Read More- problem of other minds
Norman Malcolm, an American disciple of Ludwig Wittgenstein, asserted that the argument is either superfluous or its conclusion unintelligible to the person who would make it, because, in order to know what the conclusion āthat human figure has thoughts and feelingsā means, one would haveā¦
Read MoreNorman Malcolm, an American disciple of Ludwig Wittgenstein, asserted that the argument is either superfluous or its conclusion unintelligible to the person who would make it, because, in order to know what the conclusion āthat human figure has thoughts and feelingsā means, one would haveā¦
Read More