- French:
- Nicolas Dâautrecourt
- Born:
- c. 1300,, Autrecourt, near Verdun, Fr.
- Died:
- after 1350, , Metz, Lorrain
Nicholas Of Autrecourt
-
Who was Nicholas of Autrecourt?
Nicholas of Autrecourt (born circa 1300, died after 1350) was a French philosopher and theologian known for developing medieval Skepticism. As a student at the University of Paris, he became an adherent of nominalism, which posited that only individual objects are real and that universal concepts are simply names.
Nicholas rejected Aristotelian objectivism and proposed that intellectual certitude relies on the logical principle of identity and immediate sense data. He denied the possibility of knowing any causal relation experientially and rejected rational proof for the existence of God.
Condemned for heresy in 1346, Nicholas was ordered to resign his professorship, recant his errors, and burn his writings. He became dean of the cathedral at Metz in 1350.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
When and where did Nicholas of Autrecourt live?
Nicholas of Autrecourt (c. 1300âafter 1350) was a French philosopher and theologian known for his extreme Skepticism. Born in Autrecourt, near Verdun, France, he studied at the University of Paris from 1320 to 1327.
A proponent of nominalism, Nicholas believed only individual objects are real and rejected Aristotelian objectivism. His ideas led to a heresy trial in 1340, and in 1347 he was ordered to recant his errors and burn his writings. In 1350, he became dean of the cathedral at Metz, Lorraine, after which his life is not known.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What was Nicholas of Autrecourt known for studying?
Nicholas of Autrecourt was a French philosopher and theologian known for taking medieval Skepticism to its furthest logical conclusions, though they were deemed heretical. He was an advocate of nominalism, which posited that only individual objects are real and that universal concepts are simply names.
Nicholas rejected Aristotelian objectivism, suggesting intellectual certitude relies on the logical principle of identity and the immediate evidence of sense data. He denied the possibility of knowing any causal relation experientially and rejected rational proof for God's existence, leaning towards the idea that the world has existed eternally. The ecclesiastical judges at Nicholasâ heresy trial did not accept his avowals of Christian belief and denounced him.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What were some of the main ideas Nicholas of Autrecourt questioned or challenged?
Nicholas of Autrecourt, a French philosopher and theologian, is known for taking medieval skepticism to its extreme logical conclusions.
Nicholas questioned traditional Aristotelian objectivism and proposed that intellectual certitude relies on the logical principle of identity and immediate sense data. Consistent with his nominalist doctrine, Nicholas denied that any causal relation could be known experientially and taught that the very principle of causality could be reduced to the empirical declaration of the succession of two facts. He also rejected the possibility of rational proof for the existence of God. Because of the fallibility of the senses and the human inclination toward erroneous judgment, evidence and truth are not always identical, and philosophy at best is simply the prevalence of the more probable over the less probable.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Nicholas of Autrecourtâs ideas differ from other philosophers of his time?
Nicholas of Autrecourt, a French philosopher and theologian, gained recognition for taking medieval Skepticism to its furthest logical conclusions.
Nicholas rejected Aristotelian objectivism, which alluded to a single intellect for all men. Instead, he proposed that intellectual certitude had only two bases: the logical principle of identity and immediate evidence from sense data. Consistent with his nominalist doctrine, Nicholas denied any causal relation could be known experientially and taught that the very principle of causality could be reduced to the empirical declaration of the succession of two facts. The consequence of such a concept of causality, he averred, was to reject the possibility of any rational proof for the existence of God and to deny any divine cause in creation. Indeed, he held as more probable that the world had existed from eternity. He also advocated for the atomism of ancient Greeks as a more adequate explanation of the universe, as opposed to Aristotelianism, which he viewed as opposed to Christian faith.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What impact did Nicholas of Autrecourtâs writings have on philosophy and theology?
Nicholas of Autrecourt, a French philosopher and theologian, is most known for taking medieval Skepticism to its furthest logical conclusions, though they were deemed heretical.
Nicholas's philosophy rejected Aristotelian objectivism, and he proposed that intellectual certitude relies on the logical principle of identity and immediate sense data. Consistent with his nominalist doctrine, Nicholas denied that any causal relation could be known experientially and taught that the very principle of causality could be reduced to the empirical declaration of the succession of two facts. He rejected the possibility of rational proof for God's existence and suggested the world may have existed eternally.
Nicholas's views were controversial. In 1347, Pope Clement VI condemned him, ordering him to resign his professorship, recant his errors, and publicly burn his writings. His skepticism and criticism of Aristotle influenced later medieval philosophy, contributing to a growing skepticism in the field.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Nicholas Of Autrecourt (born c. 1300, Autrecourt, near Verdun, Fr.âdied after 1350, Metz, Lorrain) was a French philosopher and theologian known principally for developing medieval Skepticism to its extreme logical conclusions, which were condemned as heretical.
Nicholas was an advanced student in liberal arts and philosophy at the Sorbonne faculty of the University of Paris from 1320 to 1327. He became one of the most notable adherents of nominalism, a school of thought holding that only individual objects are real and that universal concepts simply express things as names. Nicholasâ chief writings are commentaries on the 12th-century Sentences of Peter Lombard, the basic medieval compendium of philosophical theology, and on the Politics of Aristotle; nine letters to the Franciscan monk-philosopher Bernard of Arezzo; and an important treatise usually designated by the opening words Exigit ordo executionis (âThe order of completion requiresâ). This last contains the 60 theses controverted at Nicholasâ heresy trial, convened by Pope Benedict XII at Avignon, in 1340.
Nicholas rejected the traditional Aristotelian objectivism, with its allusions to a single intellect for all men, and proposed that there are only two bases for intellectual certitude: the logical principle of identity, with its correlative principle of contradiction, which states that a thing cannot simultaneously be itself and another; and the immediate evidence of sense data. Consistent with his nominalist doctrine, he denied that any causal relation could be known experientially and taught that the very principle of causality could be reduced to the empirical declaration of the succession of two facts. The consequence of such a concept of causality, he averred, was to reject the possibility of any rational proof for the existence of God and to deny any divine cause in creation. Indeed, he held as more probable that the world had existed from eternity.
Nicholasâ nominalism precluded the possibility of knowing anything as a permanent concept and allowed only the conscious experience of an objectâs sensible qualities. Rejecting ScholasticâAristotelian philosophy and physics, Nicholas believed that the physical and mental universe is ultimately composed of simple, indivisible particles or atoms. He maintained, however, that his innovative thought did not affect his fidelity to Christian religious tradition, including the moral commandments and belief in a future life. Faith and reason, he taught, operate independently from each other, and one could assent to a religious doctrine that reason might contradict. Because of the fallibility of the senses and the human inclinationâeven in Aristotleâtoward erroneous judgment, evidence and truth are not always identical, and philosophy at best is simply the prevalence of the more probable over the less probable.
The ecclesiastical judges at Nicholasâ heresy trial labeled his avowals of Christian belief as mere subterfuge and denounced him. Condemned in 1346 by Pope Clement VI, Nicholas finally was ordered in 1347 to resign his professorship, recant his error, and publicly burn his writings. That he took refuge with Emperor Louis IV the Bavarian is a legend created to form a parallel with the life of William of Ockham, his nominalist precursor. Nicholas became dean of the cathedral at Metz in 1350, after which nothing more is heard of him. His Exigit manuscript was discovered by A. Birkenmayer at the Bodleian Library, Oxford, and was published in 1939 by J.R. OâDonnell in Medieval Studies.