How does the ending of Troilus and Criseyde contrast earthly love with divine love?

Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.

In Geoffrey Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde, the conclusion serves as a moral pivot that recontextualizes the preceding narrative. As the protagonist’s soul ascends into the heavens following his death in the Trojan War, the poem explicitly contrasts the folly of complete immersion in earthly, sexual love with the eternal, unchanging nature of the love of God.12

This perspective is deeply influenced by the Consolation of Philosophy by Boethius, which emphasizes the pursuit of true happiness and salvation over transient worldly attachments. By framing the lovers' intense psychological and emotional experiences against the backdrop of divine eternity, Chaucer highlights the limitations of human passion. The narrator’s final commentary underscores this distinction, suggesting that while earthly love is subject to the fluctuations of fortune and human frailty, divine love offers a permanent and transcendent resolution.21