- Born:
- November 14, 1861, Portage, Wisconsin, U.S.
- Died:
- March 14, 1932, San Marino, California (aged 70)
- Awards And Honors:
- Pulitzer Prize (1933)
Frederick Jackson Turner
-
Who was Frederick Jackson Turner?
Frederick Jackson Turner (1861–1932) was an American historian celebrated for his "frontier thesis," which significantly shaped American historical interpretation. He argued that the United States' distinctiveness arose from its history of westward expansion.
In his 1893 essay, "The Significance of the Frontier in American History," Turner posited that American character was molded by frontier conditions, including abundant free land, fostering traits like self-reliance, individualism, inventiveness, and optimism. This thesis became the dominant view of American history for over half a century.
Turner taught at the University of Wisconsin and Harvard University, training many distinguished historians. His works include The Frontier in American History (1920) and The Significance of Sections in American History (1932), for which he posthumously won the Pulitzer Prize in 1933.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is Frederick Jackson Turner best known for?
Frederick Jackson Turner is best known for his frontier thesis, which is explained in his essay, "The Significance of the Frontier in American History" (1893). Turner argued that the distinctiveness of the United States was attributable to its long history of "westering." He insisted that American institutions were unique because they had been compelled to adapt to the changes involved in crossing a continent, winning a wilderness, and developing out of the primitive conditions of the frontier.
Turner's frontier thesis became the dominant interpretation of American history for over half a century. Even though modern historians tend to disagree with such sweeping theories, his frontier thesis remains the most popular explanation of American development among the public.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What was the 'Frontier Thesis' that Turner developed?
Frederick Jackson Turner's "Frontier Thesis," articulated in his 1893 essay, argued that the American character was uniquely shaped by the experience of westward expansion. He believed that settling the frontier fostered traits like individualism, self-reliance, inventiveness, and optimism. Turner posited that the frontier necessitated adaptation to primitive conditions, fostering a distinct American identity. This "westering" process, according to Turner, differentiated the United States from its European roots, shaping its institutions and democratic ideals. Though influential, the thesis has faced criticism for its monocausal interpretation and neglect of the impact on Native Americans.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Turner's Frontier Thesis explain the development of American democracy?
Frederick Jackson Turner's Frontier Thesis posited that the American frontier shaped the nation's distinct character and democratic institutions. Turner argued that the frontier experience fostered self-reliance, individualism, and inventiveness among settlers. The need for cooperation in overcoming frontier challenges also promoted democratic governance and equal representation. This unique environment, according to Turner, transformed European traditions into uniquely American traits, distinguishing American democracy from its European roots.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Turner's ideas influence the study of American history?
Frederick Jackson Turner's ideas, particularly his frontier thesis, profoundly influenced the study of American history by arguing that the American character was shaped by the experience of westward expansion. He emphasized the frontier's role in fostering traits like individualism, self-reliance, and democracy.
Turner encouraged historians to explore topics such as immigration, urbanization, and social and cultural history, advocating for the use of social sciences in historical research. Although his thesis has faced criticism for its ethnocentric view and overemphasis on the frontier, it remains a central point of discussion in American history.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some criticisms of Turner's Frontier Thesis?
Frederick Jackson Turner's frontier thesis, which argued that the American character was shaped by the experience of westward expansion, has faced considerable criticism.
Critics argue that Turner's view was ethnocentric because it ignored the Native Americans who already inhabited the land. They also contend that his thesis overemphasized the role of the frontier in promoting democracy, pointing out that democratic tendencies existed in the urban-industrial East and were absent in other frontiers. Some historians view Turner's concept as a justification for imperialist expansion and exploitation of resources.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Frederick Jackson Turner (born November 14, 1861, Portage, Wisconsin, U.S.—died March 14, 1932, San Marino, California) was an American historian best known for the “frontier thesis.” The single most influential interpretation of the American past, it proposed that the distinctiveness of the United States was attributable to its long history of “westering.” Despite the fame of this monocausal interpretation, as the teacher and mentor of dozens of young historians, Turner insisted on a multicausal model of history, with a recognition of the interaction of politics, economics, culture, and geography. Turner’s penetrating analyses of American history and culture were powerfully influential and changed the direction of much American historical writing.
Born in frontier Wisconsin and educated at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, Turner did graduate work at Johns Hopkins University under Herbert Baxter Adams. Awarded a doctorate in 1891, Turner was one of the first historians professionally trained in the United States rather than in Europe. He began his teaching career at the University of Wisconsin in 1889. He began to make his mark with his first professional paper, “The Significance of History” (1891), which contains the famous line “Each age writes the history of the past anew with reference to the conditions uppermost in its own time.” The controversial notion that there was no fixed historical truth, and that all historical interpretation should be shaped by present concerns, would become the hallmark of the so-called “New History,” a movement that called for studies illuminating the historical development of the political and cultural controversies of the day. Turner should be counted among the “progressive historians,” though, with the political temperament of a small-town Midwesterner, his progressivism was rather timid. Nevertheless, he made it clear that his historical writing was shaped by a contemporary agenda.
Turner first detailed his own interpretation of American history in his justly famous paper, “The Significance of the Frontier in American History,” delivered at a meeting of historians in Chicago in 1893 and published many times thereafter. Adams, his mentor at Johns Hopkins, had argued that all significant American institutions derived from German and English antecedents. Rebelling against this view, Turner argued instead that Europeans had been transformed by the process of settling the American continent and that what was unique about the United States was its frontier history. (Ironically, Turner passed up an opportunity to attend Buffalo Bill’s Wild West show so that he could complete “The Significance of the Frontier in American History” on the morning that he presented it.) He traced the social evolution of frontier life as it continually developed across the continent from the primitive conditions experienced by the explorer, trapper, and trader, through maturing agricultural stages, finally reaching the complexity of city and factory. Turner held that the American character was decisively shaped by conditions on the frontier, in particular the abundance of free land, the settling of which engendered such traits as self-reliance, individualism, inventiveness, restless energy, mobility, materialism, and optimism. Turner’s “frontier thesis” rose to become the dominant interpretation of American history for the next half-century and longer. In the words of historian William Appleman Williams, it “rolled through the universities and into popular literature like a tidal wave.” While today’s professional historians tend to reject such sweeping theories, emphasizing instead a variety of factors in their interpretations of the past, Turner’s frontier thesis remains the most popular explanation of American development among the literate public.
For a scholar of such wide influence, Turner wrote relatively few books. His Rise of the New West, 1819–1829 (1906) was published as a volume in The American Nation series, which included contributions from the nation’s leading historians. The follow-up to that study, The United States, 1830–1850: The Nation and Its Sections (1935), would not be published until after his death. Turner may have had difficulty writing books, but he was a brilliant master of the historical essay. The winner of an oratorical medal as an undergraduate, he also was a gifted and active public speaker. His deep, melodious voice commanded attention whether he was addressing a teachers group, an audience of alumni, or a branch of the Chautauqua movement. His writing, too, bore the stamp of oratory; indeed, he reworked his lectures into articles that appeared in the nation’s most influential popular and scholarly journals.
Many of Turner’s best essays were collected in The Frontier in American History (1920) and The Significance of Sections in American History (1932), for which he was posthumously awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 1933. In these writings Turner promoted new methods in historical research, including the techniques of the newly founded social sciences, and urged his colleagues to study new topics such as immigration, urbanization, economic development, and social and cultural history. He also commented directly on the connections he saw between the past and the present.
The end of the frontier era of continental expansion, Turner reasoned, had thrown the nation “back upon itself.” Writing that “imperious will and force” had to be replaced by social reorganization, he called for an expanded system of educational opportunity that would supplant the geographic mobility of the frontier. “The test tube and the microscope are needed rather than ax and rifle,” he wrote; “in place of old frontiers of wilderness, there are new frontiers of unwon fields of science.” Pioneer ideals were to be maintained by American universities through the training of new leaders who would strive “to reconcile popular government and culture with the huge industrial society of the modern world.”
Whereas in his 1893 essay he celebrated the pioneers for the spirit of individualism that spurred migration westward, 25 years later Turner castigated “these slashers of the forest, these self-sufficing pioneers, raising the corn and livestock for their own need, living scattered and apart.” For Turner the national problem was “no longer how to cut and burn away the vast screen of the dense and daunting forest” but “how to save and wisely use the remaining timber.” At the end of his career, he stressed the vital role that regionalism would play in counteracting the atomization brought about by the frontier experience. Turner hoped that stability would replace mobility as a defining factor in the development of American society and that communities would become stronger as a result. What the world needed now, he argued, was “a highly organized provincial life to serve as a check upon mob psychology on a national scale, and to furnish that variety which is essential to vital growth and originality.” Turner never ceased to treat history as contemporary knowledge, seeking to explore the ways that the nation might rechannel its expansionist impulses into the development of community life.
Turner taught at the University of Wisconsin until 1910, when he accepted an appointment to a distinguished chair of history at Harvard University. At these two institutions he helped build two of the great university history departments of the 20th century and trained many distinguished historians, including Carl Becker, Merle Curti, Herbert Bolton, and Frederick Merk, who became Turner’s successor at Harvard. He was an early leader of the American Historical Association, serving as its president in 1910 and on the editorial board of the association’s American Historical Review from 1910 to 1915. Poor health forced his early retirement from Harvard in 1924. Turner moved to the Huntington Library in San Marino, California, where he remained as senior research associate until his death.