- Born:
- Nov. 15, 1882, Vienna, Austria-Hungary
- Title / Office:
- Supreme Court of the United States (1939-1962), United States
Felix Frankfurter
-
Who was Felix Frankfurter?
Felix Frankfurter (1882–1965) was a U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice (1939–1962) and a noted legal scholar and teacher. He was a leading proponent of judicial self-restraint, believing judges should closely follow precedent and prioritize the intent of legislators when deciding cases.
Frankfurter, an Austrian-Jewish immigrant, advised Presidents Wilson and Roosevelt, and he helped found the ACLU. While he insisted on freedom of expression, he was disinclined to protect the civil liberties of political radicals. Although he believed in procedural safeguards, he also felt the Supreme Court should defer to the government's branches and to the states.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What important job did Felix Frankfurter have in the United States?
Felix Frankfurter was an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1939 to 1962. A noted scholar and law teacher, he was known as the high court’s leading exponent of judicial self-restraint. Frankfurter believed judges should closely follow precedent and set aside personal opinions, deciding only “whether legislators could in reason have enacted such a law."
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is a Supreme Court justice, and what role did Frankfurter play?
A Supreme Court justice is a judge on the highest court in the country. The chief justice is the presiding judge. Justices are appointed by the president and have lifetime tenure. They decide cases based on the constitutionality of laws and actions, with the power of judicial review.
Felix Frankfurter served as an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1939 to 1962. He was a proponent of judicial self-restraint, believing judges should adhere to precedents and prioritize the intent of legislators.
4 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What was Felix Frankfurter known for while serving on the Supreme Court?
During his time as a Supreme Court Justice (1939-1962), Felix Frankfurter was known as a leading proponent of judicial self-restraint. This doctrine emphasized that judges should closely follow legal precedent and avoid injecting their own opinions into decisions, focusing instead on whether legislators had reasonable grounds for enacting a law. While Frankfurter was a defender of freedom of expression, he was disinclined to support the civil liberties of political radicals. In Wolf v. Colorado (1949), Frankfurter condemned illegal seizure of evidence by state officials but held that illegally obtained evidence was admissible in state court.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What were some important cases or decisions that Felix Frankfurter was involved in?
As a Supreme Court Justice (1939-1962), Felix Frankfurter was known as a leading proponent of judicial self-restraint, arguing judges should closely adhere to precedent and exercise deference to legislative action.
Some notable cases and decisions involving Frankfurter include:
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire: In 1957, Frankfurter upheld a socialist college professor's claim to academic freedom against a state investigation.
- Wolf v. Colorado: In 1949, Frankfurter condemned illegal seizure of evidence by state officials but held that the Fourteenth Amendment did not require state courts to exclude unlawfully obtained evidence, a theory the Supreme Court later rejected.
- Baker v. Carr: In his final major opinion, Frankfurter dissented in this 1962 legislative reapportionment case, arguing that inequitable representation in legislatures was a political matter not subject to federal judicial power.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Felix Frankfurter's views and ideas influence the Supreme Court and American law?
Felix Frankfurter, an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court (1939–62), championed judicial self-restraint, urging judges to strictly adhere to precedent and to only consider if legislators had reasonable grounds for enacting a law.
His influence stemmed from his belief in the integrity of government, which led him to adopt a hands-off approach regarding federal and state legislative actions, similar to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. Although he valued freedom of expression, he was disinclined to protect the civil liberties of political radicals. Despite his belief in procedural safeguards, Frankfurter also maintained that the Supreme Court should defer to other government branches and states.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Felix Frankfurter (born Nov. 15, 1882, Vienna, Austria-Hungary—died Feb. 22, 1965, Washington, D.C., U.S.) was an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court (1939–62), a noted scholar and teacher of law, who was in his time the high court’s leading exponent of the doctrine of judicial self-restraint. He held that judges should adhere closely to precedent, disregarding their own opinions, and decide only “whether legislators could in reason have enacted such a law.”
Frankfurter was the son of a Jewish merchant who left Vienna for New York in 1893. Young Frankfurter was educated at the City College of New York and at the Harvard Law School, where he later taught (1914–39). He served as assistant to Henry L. Stimson when Stimson was U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York (1906–09) and secretary of war under President William Howard Taft (1911–13). Frankfurter’s influence on President Franklin D. Roosevelt was largely responsible for Stimson’s return (1940) as head of the War Department during World War II.
Frankfurter was a legal adviser to President Woodrow Wilson at the Paris Peace Conference (1919). During the immediate postwar period he was one of the most active American Zionists, and he helped to found the American Civil Liberties Union (1920). He delivered blistering attacks on the conviction of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti—in which he was encouraged by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis under a secret arrangement that was not revealed until 1982, when their correspondence was published. Brandeis, from his appointment in 1916 until 1939, when Frankfurter himself joined the court, corresponded frequently with Frankfurter, sending him a yearly stipend for legislative research and for such politico-social actions as the defense of Sacco and Vanzetti.
When Franklin D. Roosevelt became president (1933), Frankfurter, who had advised him during his term as governor of New York, advised him on New Deal legislation and other matters. He was appointed by Roosevelt to the Supreme Court on Jan. 5, 1939. Concerned more with the integrity of government than with the victims of legal injustice, Frankfurter evinced toward federal and state legislative action a hands-off attitude similar to that of his friend Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. His insistence on freedom of expression was partly offset by his disinclination to uphold the civil liberties of political radicals, especially members of the U.S. Communist Party during the “witch hunt” of the 1950s. In Sweezy v. New Hampshire (1957), however, he upheld a claim of academic freedom by a socialist college professor subjected to a state investigation.
Frankfurter’s belief that decent government depends in part on procedural safeguards for criminal suspects occasionally conflicted with his policy that the Supreme Court should defer to other branches of the federal government and to the states. In the criminal case of Wolf v. Colorado (1949), for example, he spoke for the court in condemning illegal seizure of evidence by state officials, but he ruled that the “due process of law” clause of the 14th Amendment (1868) to the U.S. Constitution did not require a state court to exclude evidence unlawfully obtained. (The Supreme Court repudiated this theory in 1961.) In his last major opinion, a 64-page dissent in Baker v. Carr (1962; the first of a series of legislative reapportionment cases in the 1960s), he unsuccessfully asserted that inequitable representation in legislatures is a “political controversy” not subject to the federal judicial power.
Frankfurter retired in 1962. In July 1963 President John F. Kennedy awarded him the Medal of Freedom. Among his books are The Business of the Supreme Court (1927; with James Landis); Mr. Justice Holmes and the Supreme Court (1938); The Case of Sacco and Vanzetti (2nd ed., 1954); and Felix Frankfurter Reminisces (1960).