Charles Stevenson
Quick Summary
Charles Stevenson was an American philosopher who significantly developed the metaethical view known as emotivism. Emotivism posits that moral judgments are not statements of fact but rather expressions of the speaker's feelings or attitudes.12
According to Stevenson's development of emotivism, when someone says an action is "wrong," they are not just stating a fact but are also expressing disapproval and encouraging others to share that attitude. This view emphasizes the emotive impact of language in moral discourse, distinguishing it from mere expressions of personal taste. Stevenson's work, particularly in his book Ethics and Language, focused on how language is used to influence others' attitudes on moral issues.12
Ask Britannica AI about this topic
Britannica doesn't have a full article on this topic, so we've curated a list of our relevant coverage.
ethicsEmotivism…developed by the American philosopher Charles Stevenson (1908–79) in Ethics and Language (1945). As the titles of the books of this period suggest, moral philosophers (and philosophers in other fields as well) were now paying more attention to language and to the different ways in which it could be used.…
Read More…developed by the American philosopher Charles Stevenson (1908–79) in Ethics and Language (1945). As the titles of the books of this period suggest, moral philosophers (and philosophers in other fields as well) were now paying more attention to language and to the different ways in which it could be used.…
Read More
positivismLanguage and the clarification of meaning…that of the American positivist Charles Stevenson, were soon to correct and modify those extremes. By proper allocation of the cognitive and the normative (motivative) components of value statements, many thinkers rendered the originally harsh and implausible positivist view of value judgments more acceptable. Nevertheless, there is—in every positivistic view—an…
Read More…that of the American positivist Charles Stevenson, were soon to correct and modify those extremes. By proper allocation of the cognitive and the normative (motivative) components of value statements, many thinkers rendered the originally harsh and implausible positivist view of value judgments more acceptable. Nevertheless, there is—in every positivistic view—an…
Read More