- Born:
- June 22, 1947, Beaune, France
- Died:
- October 9, 2022, Paris (aged 75)
- Awards And Honors:
- Holberg Prize (2013)
- Notable Works:
- âLaboratory Lifeâ
- Subjects Of Study:
- science
Bruno Latour
-
Who was Bruno Latour?
Bruno Latour (1947â2022) was a French sociologist and anthropologist known for his work studying science and technology in society. His early work challenged the positivist view of scientific inquiry, presenting scientific knowledge as a product of social, political, and economic interactions. Latour often compared the scientific community to a battlefield, where theories succeed by gaining enough support to overcome alternatives.
Another key aspect of Latour's work was his focus on relationships between human and nonhuman agents. This approach, known as actor-network theory, influenced science and technology studies. While his denial of objective truths was criticized by some scientists, his innovative approach was welcomed by many social scientists. In 2013, he received the Holberg International Memorial Prize for his studies of science and technology in society.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What fields did Bruno Latour study and work in?
Bruno Latour was a French sociologist and anthropologist known for his work in science and technology in society. His early studies were in philosophy and theology, but his interests expanded to include anthropology and the philosophy of science and technology while he was stationed in CĂŽte dâIvoire for military service in the early 1970s. He received a doctorate in philosophy from the University of Tours in 1975. Between 1982 and 2006, Latour taught at MINES ParisTech, and he was a professor at the Institute of Political Sciences from 2006 to 2017.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is Bruno Latour known for in sociology and anthropology?
Bruno Latour was a French sociologist and anthropologist known for his work studying science and technology in society.
Latour is known for actor-network theory, which focuses on the relationships between human and nonhuman agents. He argues that scientific knowledge is produced by tracing networks of relationships between entities such as lab animals, scientific texts, researchers, technologies, and social movements. His work explored the connections between nature, science, and politics.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What is actor-network theory, which was developed by Latour?
Bruno Latour (1947-2022) was a French sociologist and anthropologist known for his work in science and technology studies. Actor-network theory, developed by Latour, explores how scientific knowledge is produced through interconnected relationships between human and nonhuman agents. It involves tracing networks between entities such as researchers, lab animals, technologies, and social movements. Latour likened the scientific community to a battlefield where theories succeed by gaining enough support to overcome alternatives. His work, while innovative, has faced criticism for challenging the existence of objective truths in science.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Bruno Latour change the way people study science and technology?
Bruno Latour, a French sociologist and anthropologist, is known for his work studying science and technology in society. Latour broke away from the positivist view that saw scientific inquiry as rational and asocial. Instead, he argued that scientific knowledge is socially, politically, and economically constructed.
Latour's actor-network theory emphasizes the complex relationships between human and nonhuman agents. He argued that scientific knowledge is produced through networks connecting lab animals, researchers, texts, technologies, and social movements. Latour's approach, though criticized by some scientists for denying objective truths, has been influential in science and technology studies and welcomed by many social scientists for its innovation.
3 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Why are Bruno Latour's ideas important for understanding the relationship between humans, science, and society?
Bruno Latour, a French sociologist and anthropologist, significantly contributed to understanding the relationships among humans, science, and society through his innovative work in science and technology studies.
Latour challenged the positivist view of science as purely rational, arguing instead that scientific knowledge is socially constructed through interactions among various human and nonhuman agents, including researchers, technologies, and social movements. His actor-network theory emphasizes these heterogeneous relationships, influencing fields beyond science and technology studies. By examining how scientific facts emerge through social and political processes, Latour offered fresh perspectives, though his denial of objective truths was met with criticism from some scientists.
2 Britannica SourcesCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Bruno Latour (born June 22, 1947, Beaune, Franceâdied October 9, 2022, Paris) was a French sociologist and anthropologist known for his innovative and iconoclastic work in the study of science and technology in society.
Latourâs early studies were in philosophy and theology, but his interests expanded to include anthropology and the philosophy of science and technology while he was stationed in CĂŽte dâIvoire for military service in the early 1970s. He received a doctorate in philosophy from the University of Tours in 1975.
Latourâs subsequent work dealt with the activities of communities of scientists. His book Laboratory Life (1979), written with Steven Woolgar, a sociologist, was the result of more than a year spent observing molecular biologists at the Salk Institute for Biological Sciences in La Jolla, California. Latour and Woolgarâs account broke away from the positivist view of scientific inquiry as a rational and largely asocial process capable of uncovering universally valid truths regarding the natural world. They instead presented scientific knowledge as an artificial product of various social, political, and economic interactions, most of them competitive.
Latour further expanded on these ideas in such books as Les Microbes: guerre et paix, suivi de irrĂ©ductions (1984; published in English as The Pasteurization of France), Science in Action (1987), and Nous nâavons jamais Ă©tĂ© modernes (1991; We Have Never Been Modern). In his writings, Latour often likened the scientific community to a battlefield: new theories, facts, techniques, and technologies succeeded by marshalling enough users and supporters to overwhelm any alternatives, thus immunizing themselves against future challenges. It was by winning this fight for dominance that scientific facts came to be true; Latour dismissed questions about the universal validity of scientific facts as both unanswerable and irrelevant to his concerns. This insistence on seeing scientific facts as purely social constructions sometimes led Latour to conclusions that were seen as absurd outside the community of social theorists. In 1998, for example, Latour rejected as anachronistic the recent discovery that the pharaoh Ramses II had died of tuberculosis, asserting that the tubercle bacillus was discovered only in 1882 and could not properly be said to have existed before then.
Another distinguishing aspect of Latourâs work was its focus on the complex and heterogeneous relationships between both human and nonhuman agents. He argued that the production of scientific knowledge could be understood only by tracing networks of relationships between entities as disparate as lab animals, existing scientific texts, human researchers, experimental subjects, established technologies, and social movements, among others. This approach became known as actor-network theory, and its influence soon spread beyond Latourâs field of science and technology studies. Latourâs work exasperated many practicing scientists with its denial of the existence of objective truths and its claims to have unmasked science as a social process and debunked its pretenses of rationality. However, his work was welcomed by many social scientists for its fresh and innovative approach to the study of science.
In 2013 he was awarded the Holberg International Memorial Prize, which is given for outstanding achievement in the arts, humanities, social sciences, law, and theology. The award recognized Latour for his influential ethnographic and theoretical studies of science and technology in society.
While conducting his research, Latour also taught. Between 1982 and 2006, he taught at MINES ParisTech (Ăcole Nationale SupĂ©rieure des Mines de Paris). He later was a professor (2006â17) at the Institute of Political Sciences (Institut des Sciences Politiques; âSciences Poâ) in Paris and served as its vice president for research (2007â13).
Among Latourâs many books were Aramis; ou, lâamour des techinques (1992; Aramis; or, The Love of Technology), which traces a failed attempt to construct an automated personal rapid transit system in Paris; Politiques de la nature (1999; The Politics of Nature), an examination of the connections between nature, science, and politics; and Sur le culte moderne des dieux faitiches (2009; On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods), which draws connections between religious and scientific belief systems. His later books included EnquĂȘte sur les modes dâexistence (2012; An Inquiry into Modes of Existence).