- Born:
- May 24, 1870, New York City, New York, U.S.
- Died:
- July 9, 1938, Port Chester, New York (aged 68)
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo
-
Who was Benjamin Nathan Cardozo?
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo (1870–1938) was a U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice from 1932 to 1938. A creative common-law judge and legal essayist, he influenced American appellate judging, advocating for greater engagement with public policy and modernizing legal principles.
Cardozo served on New York's Court of Appeals from 1914 to 1932, becoming chief judge in 1926. His notable cases include MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company (1916), which established an implied safety warranty between manufacturers and consumers, and Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. (1928), which redefined negligence in American tort law. President Herbert Hoover appointed Cardozo to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1932 after Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., resigned. Cardozo sided with liberal justices like Louis D. Brandeis and Harlan Fiske Stone during the New Deal era.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What important job did Cardozo have in the United States?
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo served as an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1932 to 1938. He was also a judge on New York's highest state court, the Court of Appeals, from 1914 to 1932, and chief judge from 1926. Cardozo was known for his creative approach to common-law judging and his influence on modernizing legal principles. In MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company (1916), he established an implied safety warranty between manufacturers and consumers, and his decision in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. (1928) redefined negligence in American tort law.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
Which court did Cardozo serve on, and what was his role there?
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo served as an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1932 to 1938. However, he is also known for his work on the highest state tribunal in New York, the Court of Appeals, where he served from 1914 to 1932, becoming chief judge in 1926. Cardozo influenced American appellate judging, inclining it towards greater involvement with public policy and modernization of legal principles. During his time on the Court of Appeals, its quality was considered by many to exceed that of the Supreme Court.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What are some famous decisions that Cardozo helped make?
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo, a U.S. Supreme Court Justice from 1932 to 1938, significantly influenced American legal principles.
Some of his notable decisions include:
* MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company (1916): Cardozo established an implied safety warranty between manufacturers and consumers, even with a retail dealer involved. This doctrine was later adopted in the United States and Great Britain.
* Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. (1928): Cardozo helped redefine negligence in American tort law.
* Helvering v. Davis (1937): Cardozo wrote the majority opinion, upholding the federal Social Security program based on the Constitution's general welfare provision.
* Palko v. Connecticut (1937): Cardozo held that the Fourteenth Amendment imposed on states only the Bill of Rights provisions essential to ordered liberty. Though later reversed, this test was used through the 1960s.1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
How did Cardozo influence American law and legal thinking?
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo significantly shaped American legal thinking by advocating for greater judicial engagement with public policy and modernizing legal principles. His 1916 MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company decision established an implied safety warranty between manufacturers and consumers, influencing product liability law nationwide. Cardozo's redefinition of negligence in American tort law through the 1928 Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. case remains highly influential.
As a Supreme Court Justice, Cardozo supported New Deal policies, writing the majority opinion in Helvering v. Davis (1937), which upheld the Social Security program's constitutionality. Cardozo's jurisprudence, particularly his book The Nature of the Judicial Process (1921), emphasized the judiciary's role in adapting the law to meet social needs.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. -
What qualities or ideas made Cardozo a respected jurist?
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo was a respected jurist due to his creativity, influence on public policy, and modernization of legal principles. As a judge, he was esteemed for his work on the New York Court of Appeals, where his decisions, such as in MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company (1916) and Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. (1928), redefined product safety and negligence laws. Cardozo's jurisprudence, especially his book The Nature of the Judicial Process (1921), is highly regarded. On the Supreme Court, he sided with liberal justices and upheld the Social Security program in Helvering v. Davis (1937). Cardozo was also an early leader of the American Law Institute.
1 Britannica SourceCreated from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo (born May 24, 1870, New York City, New York, U.S.—died July 9, 1938, Port Chester, New York) was an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1932 to 1938.
Cardozo was a creative common-law judge and legal essayist who influenced a trend in American appellate judging toward greater involvement with public policy and a consequent modernization of legal principles. Generally a liberal, he was less concerned with ideology than with the nature of the judicial process; largely for this reason, his importance—while universally conceded—is difficult to fix precisely. Although he was esteemed for his service as an associate justice of the Supreme Court, he was probably more significant for his work on the highest state tribunal in New York, the Court of Appeals (1914–32; chief judge from 1926).
A member of a distinguished Sephardic Jewish family, Cardozo enjoyed an unblemished personal reputation, although his father, Albert Jacob Cardozo, a New York Supreme Court justice with Tammany Hall connections, had resigned in 1872 under threat of impeachment. Admitted to the New York bar in 1891, Benjamin Cardozo was highly successful as a courtroom lawyer despite his mild, reserved manner. Elected to the state Supreme Court as a reform candidate in 1913, he was quickly promoted to the Court of Appeals. During his tenure, the quality of this appellate bench was thought by many to exceed that of the Supreme Court. In MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company (1916), Cardozo announced a doctrine that was later adopted elsewhere in the United States and Great Britain: an implied warranty of safety exists between a manufacturer and a private purchaser, despite intermediate ownership of the product by a retail dealer. His decision in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. (1928) helped to redefine the concept of negligence in American tort law.
After the resignation of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., in 1932, Pres. Herbert Hoover appointed Cardozo to the United States Supreme Court. In the New Deal period under Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt, Cardozo usually sided with the liberally inclined justices Louis D. Brandeis and Harlan Fiske Stone. He wrote a majority opinion for Helvering v. Davis, 301 U.S. 619, and other Social Security cases (1937), upholding the federal Social Security program on the basis of the general welfare provision of the United States Constitution (Article I, section 8). In Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937), a criminal case involving a claim of double jeopardy, he held that the Fourteenth Amendment (1868) to the Constitution imposed on the states only those provisions of the Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments) that were “of the very essence of a scheme of ordered liberty.” Although it offered a minimum of guidance and may have encouraged much more constitutional litigation than would a specific standard, this test was retained by the court through the 1960s. In 1969, however, the Supreme Court reversed the Palko ruling, holding in Benton v. Maryland that the rule against double jeopardy was so fundamental to justice as to be a requirement of due process of law.
Aside from his published opinions, Cardozo is noted for his jurisprudential work, especially The Nature of the Judicial Process (1921), based on lectures he delivered at Yale University. He was also among the early leaders of the American Law Institute, which was created to “promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to encourage and carry on scholarly and scientific legal work.”