Discover the difference between the observable universe and the whole universe

Discover the difference between the observable universe and the whole universe

Learn about the distinction between the observable universe and the whole universe.
© MinutePhysics (A Britannica Publishing Partner)
  • © American Chemical Society (A Britannica Publishing Partner)
    The chemistry of mummies, ghosts, and vampires.
  • © 2025 Thomas Reuters
    Two time-lapse videos show Suicide Basin, a glacial-dammed lake, rising in Alaska, July–August 2025. The waters eventually emptied into Mendenhall Lake and Mendenhall River.
  • Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.
    Learn how eccrine glands in the skin secrete sweat through pores in the skin's surface, from which the sweat evaporates, removing heat from the body.
  • Georges Lemaître and the big-bang theory in relation to space expansion.
  • Brief description of dark energy and the acceleration of the universe.
  • An overview of the Millennium Simulation run by researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Germany, followed by a tutorial on how to simulate the universe on a home computer.
  • Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.
    Kepler's theory of the solar system.

Transcript

The universe, informally, means everything there is. Mountains and oceans and the moon and hot nuclear balls of hydrogen and a whole lot more. But if the universe is everything, does that mean it includes the things that we don't know that we don't know exist, or even the things that we believe exist but haven't yet seen or observed? For example, is the future a part of the universe?

In physics, we usually distinguish between these two notions of universe as, one, the observable universe, which is everything whose existence we've thus far been able to confirm or observe, or could, in principle, observe if we pointed our telescopes at it, and two, the Universe with a capital U, or the whole universe, which is everything that exists, has existed, or will exist, anytime, anywhere, regardless of whether or not we are aware of it yet or ever will be.

Of course, the main reason for this distinction is so that we can talk scientifically about parts of the universe we haven't yet been able to observe, and the two biggest reasons we might not have been able to observe a piece of the universe yet are either, it's in the future, or it's so far away that light from it hasn't had time to reach us yet.

To explain, as far as we know, the universe had a beginning and is now around 13.8 billion years old. Light takes time to travel through space. So anywhere too far away from us just isn't visible yet in the same way that thunder from a distant lightning strike isn't audible until you wait long enough. If you were blind, the thunder would be the first sign you have of the storm's existence, though once you hear it, you can infer that the storm must have existed all along.

So within the observable universe, what do we know exists? Pretty much just three things. Spacetime, particles, and the physical laws that describe how spacetime and those particles interact to give rise to gravity and matter and forces and everything else. It's open for debate whether or not mathematics is a part of the universe or if it exists outside the universe in some sort of mathematical heavens. But if you think that mathematics exists, and if the universe is everything that exists, then, well, I'll leave that up to you.

There's one other thing, though. You may have heard of parallel universes or multiverses, an idea proposed by researchers or sci-fi fanatics, that perhaps what we think of as the universe is actually just a small piece of a larger thing which is really everything there is. But that's another verse of the story.

Last Modification: