Did The Night Watch cause Rembrandt's downfall?

NARRATOR 1: Light. Dark. Spirit and substance. Shadow and sunlight.
NARRATOR 2: Since Rembrandt’s death in 1669, rumors of the reasons behind his personal ruin have run wild— and what is arguably his most famous painting, The Night Watch, is at the center of most claims. The enormous painting, which stands at roughly 12 by 14 feet and was originally larger, was commissioned as one of six installations to be featured at the range where Captain Frans Banninck Cocq and his militia company practiced. Cocq, his lieutenant, Willem van Ruytenburch, and 16 of the men who formed the militia became the subjects of the painting, which Rembrandt hoped would demonstrate unity. However, due to the painting’s overall dark coloring and selective highlighting of just two figures—the girl in the background and the lieutenant— questions about his intentions with the painting arose. The gradual darkening of the painting and the “spotlight effect” at its center is what ultimately gave the painting its name, roughly a century after its completion in 1642. Despite the painting’s ability to revive movements frozen in time, its major criticism remains the shadows that engulf it, a point Rembrandt’s pupil, Samuel van Hoogstraten, affirmed. And the painting’s most famous attributes are also at the root of most conspiracies regarding Rembrandt’s downfall. Some claim that The Night Watch was so heavily critiqued that Rembrandt received few commissions in his final years, while others specifically call out the captain’s supposed distaste for the painting as a whole, due to sparse lighting on individuals of great honor and nobility. In reality, Rembrandt received a number of commissions after 1642, and the captain chose to keep a personal copy of the painting. Ultimately, Rembrandt had no one to blame for his downfall into financial ruin but himself and his own extravagant taste.