Why do some opponents believe smart growth can worsen road congestion and burden mass transit?

Opponents of smart growth argue that its implementation can negatively impact urban infrastructure in several ways. Regarding road congestion, critics maintain that the focus on compact, medium- to high-density development can exacerbate existing traffic problems rather than alleviate them.1

Furthermore, opponents contend that these policies can unnecessarily burden mass transit systems, particularly in areas where such services are already overused. By concentrating populations into denser developments, the demand for transit may outpace the capacity of existing infrastructure, leading to strain on the system.1

Additionally, some critics argue that smart growth policies increase operating costs for the private sector, which may incentivize businesses to relocate to regions with more growth-friendly regulations. These opponents also suggest that such strategies fail to fully resolve urban sprawl, as cities and suburbs often continue to expand to accommodate rising local populations despite the presence of growth boundaries.1