Britannica
Sources used in this answer
Why did humanists value both action and contemplation?
Created from Britannica articles
using AI.
AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Humanism
Marcus Tullius Cicero, detail of a marble bust; in the Capitoline Museums, Rome.
Humanists valued both action and contemplation because they believed that the development of human virtue, or humanitas, required a harmonious balance between the two.1
This perspective was rooted in the conviction that these states were complementary rather than mutually exclusive:
- The necessity of balance: Humanists argued that action without insight is aimless and barbaric, while insight without action is barren and imperfect.1
- Virtue in practice: The goal of humanistic learning was to produce virtuous policy and effective deeds. Philosophers like Matteo Palmieri emphasized that true merit lies in effective action, which requires the faculties gained through study.2
- Social responsibility: Humanism was inherently social and political. Because humanitas included qualities like fortitude, judgment, and prudence, a person could not be a merely isolated, sedentary philosopher. Instead, they were expected to participate in active life to benefit the majority and contribute to the state.21
Ultimately, humanists sought to reconcile philosophical understanding with powerful rhetoric to transform society, viewing the world as a place to test and fulfill human potential through both thought and deed.21