Why did Israel retain administration and security control in Area C of the West Bank?

Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.

Under the Oslo II Accords, the West Bank was divided into three administrative zones to manage the transition toward Palestinian self-governance. Area C, which comprises the majority of the West Bank, was designated as a territory under full Israeli administration and security control during the interim period.1

Israel retained this control for several strategic and political reasons:

  • Security and Strategic Interests: Israel’s defense establishment historically prioritized maintaining control over strategic locations, such as the Jordan Valley, to bolster national security and strengthen its position in negotiations.2
  • Protection of Settlements: Area C contains the majority of Israeli settlements, which were established for various reasons, including ideological goals, the recovery of historical property, and the desire for secure, affordable housing.2
  • Negotiation Leverage: The division of the territory was intended to be an interim measure while final status issues—such as borders, the status of settlements, and security arrangements—were negotiated between the two parties.31

While the Palestinian Authority was granted self-governance in other areas, the complexities of the conflict and the failure to reach a permanent resolution by the 1999 deadline left these arrangements in place, resulting in continued Israeli administration in Area C.31