What did the Supreme Court say New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen did not decide about gun ownership?

In the Supreme Court ruling New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, the Court held that New York’s "proper cause" requirement for concealed carry permits was unconstitutional.1

However, in a concurring opinion, Justice Samuel Alito clarified the limitations of the Court's decision. He explicitly stated that the ruling did not decide the following regarding gun ownership:

• Who may lawfully possess a firearm.1
• The requirements that must be met to purchase a gun.1
• The specific types of weapons that individuals may possess.1

This distinction highlights that the Bruen decision focused specifically on the constitutionality of public-carry licensing regimes rather than establishing broad rules for all aspects of firearm possession or acquisition.1