What are the main differences among inductive, interpretive, and intuitive divination?

In the study of divination, practices are generally categorized into three distinct modes based on their methodology and reliance on the diviner's personal gifts.1

Inductive Divination

Inductive divination relies on a systematic, predetermined procedure that is considered free from mundane control. It utilizes natural or artificial phenomena—such as the movement of birds, the patterns of astrology, or the examination of sacrificial viscera—as signs that can be read unambiguously. Because these signs are viewed as objective, it is assumed that any qualified practitioner would reach the same conclusion.123

Interpretive Divination

Interpretive divination occupies an intermediate space, combining the use of complex devices with the diviner’s personal insight. Unlike the rigid structure of inductive methods, interpretive divination involves subtle or fluid signs that require the diviner to interpret their meaning. Examples include reading tea leaves, geomancy, or interpreting dreams, where the diviner may use the tools as a projective device to help uncover the client's concerns.124

Intuitive Divination

Intuitive divination relies on the diviner's extraordinary, often inspirational, gifts rather than external trappings. This mode is frequently associated with trance states or spirit possession, where the diviner acts as a medium for a god or spirit to speak directly to the client. It is a highly dramatic form of communication that prioritizes the perceived presence of an extramundane entity over mechanical or interpretive systems.125