Britannica
Sources used in this answer
How does genocide differ from crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute?
Created from Britannica articles
using AI.
AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Genocide
Freight train tracks leading to Auschwitz-Birkenau, Nazi Germany's largest concentration camp, near OÅwiÄcim, Poland.
Under the Rome Statute, both genocide and crimes against humanity are serious international offenses, but they are distinguished primarily by the perpetrator's intent and the nature of the target.
Key Differences
- Intent: The primary distinction is that genocide requires the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a protected groupādefined as a national, ethnical, racial, or religious groupābecause of their identity. Crimes against humanity do not require this specific intent to destroy a group; they are defined by being committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population.1
- Targeted Groups: Genocide is strictly limited to the destruction of specific groups based on their nationality, ethnicity, race, or religion. Crimes against humanity cover a broader range of acts (such as murder, enslavement, torture, or rape) directed against any civilian population, regardless of the group's specific identity.21
- Overlapping Acts: While their definitions differ, the two categories can overlap. For example, mass murder or the deprivation of resources can constitute both a crime against humanity and an act of genocide if the underlying motive is the destruction of a protected group.1