How do educators decide which subjects belong in a school curriculum?

Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.

Deciding which subjects belong in a school curriculum is a fundamental challenge in the philosophy of education, as these decisions inevitably rest upon underlying philosophical assumptions about the aims of schooling and the nature of knowledge.12

Educators and theorists generally approach curriculum design through competing perspectives:

  • Traditionalist/Essentialist View: Proponents argue for a curriculum fixed in content and aim, focusing on "mental disciplines" and unchanging verities. This approach prioritizes subjects over activities and emphasizes the cultivation of the intellect, often drawing on Aristotelian or religious traditions to define what is indispensable for all students.3
  • Progressive View: Influenced by thinkers like John Dewey, this perspective emphasizes the "whole child." Curriculum is often integrated into projects that reflect the student's own experience and interests, viewing the school as a laboratory for democratic life.45

Key philosophical questions that guide these decisions include:
* Should there be a single, common curriculum for all, or should subjects vary based on individual needs and interests?1
* Is the goal to convey current theories, or to teach the scientific method and critical evaluation?1
* How should we balance academic studies with vocational education?1

Ultimately, curriculum decisions are complex, involving political, social, and psychological considerations alongside philosophical inquiry.12