How did mutual assured destruction seek to create stability between nuclear superpowers?
Mutual assured destruction (MAD) sought to create stability between nuclear superpowers by establishing a deterrence framework based on the certainty of total annihilation for both the attacker and the defender. By the mid-1960s, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara argued that stability could be maintained if both sides possessed an "assured-destruction capability"—the ability to inflict "unacceptable damage" (defined as destroying a significant percentage of the opponent's population and industry) even after absorbing a first strike.12
To ensure this stability, superpowers developed a nuclear triad consisting of land-based ballistic missiles, nuclear submarines, and long-range bombers. This redundancy guaranteed a secure second strike, making a preemptive attack irrational because it would not prevent a devastating retaliation. This "balance of terror" discouraged direct conflict, as both sides recognized that any nuclear exchange would lead to mutual destruction, ultimately influencing arms control efforts like the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty, which confirmed the primacy of offensive capabilities to maintain the strategic standoff.1324