How did Thrasymachus connect justice with the interests of the strongest political group?
In the context of the history of ethics, the Sophist Thrasymachus of Chalcedon famously argued that justice is merely a disguise for the interests of the stronger party.12
In Plato’s Republic, Thrasymachus posits that "right" or "justice" is defined by whatever serves the interests of the strongest political group in a society. This perspective suggests that those in power establish laws and moral conventions to benefit themselves, effectively framing their own self-interest as the standard for justice. This view is often summarized by the slogan "might makes right," implying that justice is not an objective or universal good, but rather a tool used by the powerful to maintain their dominance.21
Thrasymachus’s challenge serves as a foundational point of contention in Western ethics, sparking a long-standing debate between those who view morality as relative to social power and those, like Plato, who argue for the existence of an objective, universal Form of the Good.1