Britannica
Sources used in this answer
How can two belief systems be internally coherent yet disagree with each other?
Created from Britannica articles
using AI.
AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Truth
Detail of a Roman copy (2nd century bce) of a Greek alabaster portrait bust of Aristotle (c. 325 bce); in the collection of the Museo Nazionale Romano, Rome.
In the context of philosophy and logic, the existence of multiple internally coherent yet conflicting belief systems arises because internal coherenceâthe logical consistency and interconnectedness of a systemâdoes not guarantee correspondence to a single, mind-independent reality.12
Philosophers have noted that nothing prevents the existence of several equally coherent but incompatible systems. This phenomenon can be understood through several lenses:2
- Axiomatic Independence: In formal systems like set theory, a statement may be independent of the axioms, meaning both the statement and its negation can be added to the system without creating a contradiction. This allows for the development of distinct, consistent mathematical universes that disagree on fundamental propositions, such as the continuum hypothesis.3
- Underdetermination: Theories are often underdetermined by experience, meaning that evidence alone may not force a single conclusion. Different communities may adopt different foundational values or social practices, leading to divergent but internally rational belief systems.4
- Pragmatic Selection: Because coherence alone is insufficient to identify "truth," some theorists argue that systems should be evaluated by their utility or success in enabling predictions and controlling phenomena. Over time, more useful systems may displace others, similar to natural selection.2
Ultimately, while internal consistency is a necessary requirement for a logical system, it is not a sufficient condition for establishing objective truth.125