How can diverse groups of researchers improve scientific knowledge?

Feminist epistemologists argue that scientific knowledge is improved by moving away from the model of the individual expert toward an epistemic community that welcomes diverse voices.1

Because knowledge is socially situated and reflects the interests of the knower, traditional science—often dominated by a homogeneous group of white, Western, heterosexual men—may fail to be truly objective. Feminist philosophers, including Sandra Harding, contend that:12

• Broadening Perspectives: Including diverse groups helps identify research questions and social problems that are often overlooked by those in privileged positions, who may lose sight of the realities of human relations.12
• Challenging Bias: A diverse community of inquirers is better equipped to recognize and critique androcentric or sexist research methods that are often masked by claims of neutrality.12
• Approximating Objectivity: Since knowledge cannot be value-free, the only way to approximate the ideal of objectivity is to ensure that the community vetting knowledge claims is inclusive, thereby preventing the reinforcement of the political and economic status quo.1

By embracing diverse standpoints, science becomes more self-critical, embodied, and coherent.2