How do gun-control supporters respond to claims that guns are commonly used in self-defense?

Gun-control supporters challenge the claim that firearms are commonly used for self-defense by highlighting statistical data and the potential for increased danger in volatile situations.

According to data regarding violent crimes committed between 2007 and 2011, only 0.79 percent of victims utilized a firearm to protect themselves, making it the least-employed protective behavior. Similarly, for property crimes during that same period, only 0.12 percent of victims used a firearm for defense. Supporters also point to the disparity between justifiable and criminal acts, noting that in 2010, there were approximately 36 criminal gun homicides for every one justifiable homicide committed by a private citizen.1

Furthermore, advocates argue that the presence of a gun often escalates conflicts, noting that many gun-inflicted deaths arise from impromptu arguments or fights where weapons closest at hand are used. They contend that armed civilians are generally untrained in law enforcement or high-stress scenarios, which can make dangerous situations—including mass shootings—more volatile and deadly rather than safer. Research cited by proponents suggests that keeping guns in the home is associated with an increased risk of homicide by family members or acquaintances.1