Britannica
Sources used in this answer
Why are 19th-century ideas that ranked societies from savagery to civilization rejected today?
Created from Britannica articles
using AI.
AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.
Anthropology
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology director Svante Pӓӓbo posing with a model of a Neanderthal skeleton.
Nineteenth-century theories that ranked societies from "savagery" to "civilization"—often termed unilinear cultural evolution—are rejected today for several fundamental scientific and ethical reasons:
- Empirical Inaccuracy: These theories were based on speculation rather than rigorous data. Fieldwork conducted in the 20th century, particularly by Franz Boas and his students, demonstrated that cultures do not follow a single, predetermined path of development. Instead, societies evolve through diverse, multilinear processes influenced by unique histories, environmental adaptations, and diffusion (the exchange of ideas and traits between groups).123
- Ethical and Moral Failures: The ranking of societies was inherently racist and classist. By positioning Western society as the pinnacle of progress, these models justified the marginalization of other peoples. Furthermore, these ideas were often misused to support social Darwinism and eugenics, which promoted the harmful and ethically indefensible notion that certain groups were biologically inferior or "unfit".42
- Rejection of Biological Determinism: Modern anthropology affirms that there is no connection between "race" and cultural capacity. The ability to create complex culture is a universal human achievement, not a product of biological hierarchy.2