Which prominent scientists and political leaders supported eugenics in the United States?

Created from Britannica articles using AI. AI can make mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.

The eugenics movement in the United States gained significant traction during the early 20th century, drawing support from prominent figures across scientific and political spheres. It is essential to recognize that eugenics is now widely discredited as a pseudoscience, and the movement’s history of promoting involuntary sterilization and discriminatory immigration policies represents a profound violation of fundamental human rights and ethical principles.

Scientific Supporters

Several leading scientists and academics provided the intellectual framework for the movement, often focusing on the inheritance of social traits:
* Charles B. Davenport: A zoologist who directed the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) at Cold Spring Harbor.12
* Harry H. Laughlin: A key figure who superintended ERO activities, drafted model sterilization laws, and provided testimony to Congress that influenced restrictive immigration legislation.1
* Edward M. East: A plant geneticist who supported eugenic aims.2
* Hermann J. Muller: A geneticist and Nobel Prize laureate who was among those associated with the movement.2
* David Starr Jordan: An ichthyologist and president of Stanford University who chaired the eugenics section of the American Breeder’s Association.1

Political and Legal Supporters

Political leaders and jurists helped institutionalize eugenic practices, particularly through sterilization laws and immigration control:
* Theodore Roosevelt: U.S. President who favored eugenic ideals.2
* Elihu Root: Served as U.S. Secretary of State.2
* John Marshall Harlan: An Associate Justice of the Supreme Court.2
* Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.: A Supreme Court Justice who authored the majority opinion in the 1927 case Buck v. Bell, which upheld state-mandated sterilization.1
* Madison Grant: A lawyer and author of The Passing of the Great Race, whose work influenced pro-eugenic sentiment and immigration policy.1