What evidence does not support an asteroid impact as the main cause of the Permian extinction?
The hypothesis that an asteroid or bolide impact caused the Permian extinction remains a subject of significant scientific debate, primarily because it lacks the consistent physical evidence found in other extinction events, such as the end-Cretaceous impact.12
Unlike the evidence associated with the end-Cretaceous event, there is no consistent geological record at the Permian-Triassic boundary to support an impact hypothesis. Specifically, researchers have not found an anomalous presence of iridium or associated shocked quartz—quartz grains that have been subjected to the extreme temperatures and pressures characteristic of an impact shock. Furthermore, while some scientists have proposed that a large icy meteorite could have triggered sudden cooling, this theory also lacks supporting physical evidence.23
In contrast to the impact hypothesis, many researchers point to more gradual or sustained environmental shifts, such as volcanic activity from the Siberian flood basalts, which likely contributed to oceanic anoxia and significant disruptions to the carbon cycle.42